1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. California
  4. Fresno County Superior Courts
  5. William Dunlap Vs Rosita Lopez Dunlap- Dismissed
SEARCH TIPS
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators
Date
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators

Contents

Details Parties Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

William Dunlap Vs Rosita Lopez Dunlap- Dismissed

Case Last Refreshed: 3 years ago

Track Case Changes
Download Docket Print Docket

Dunlap, William, filed a(n) Divorce,Separation - Family case against Lopez Dunlap, Rosita, in the jurisdiction of Fresno County. This case was filed in Fresno County Superior Courts with Kalemkarian, David presiding.

Case Details for Dunlap, William v. Lopez Dunlap, Rosita

Case Number

(Subscribe to View)

Judge

Kalemkarian, David

pdf Get Judge Analytics Report

Filing Date

February 28, 2018

Category

Dissolution - No Children

Last Refreshed

February 21, 2021

Practice Area

Family

Time to Dismissal Following Dispositive Motions

35 days

Filing Location

Fresno County, CA

Matter Type

Divorce,Separation

Case Outcome Type

Judgment

Case Cycle Time

482 days

Parties for Dunlap, William v. Lopez Dunlap, Rosita

Plaintiffs

Dunlap, William

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Defendants

Lopez Dunlap, Rosita

Case Events for Dunlap, William v. Lopez Dunlap, Rosita

Date Type Description
June 28, 2019 Docket Event Clerk's Certificate of Mailing
June 25, 2019 Docket Event Dismissal Hearing

Judge: Kalemkarian, David
June 25, 2019 Docket Event Judge Kalemkarian Minute Order. See Attached
Time: 11:00 a.m. Dept: 202 Clerk: L. Garvin Reporter: NR Petitioner not present Respondent not present Hearing Type: Other: Dismissal Hearing No appearance by either party Other: Good cause has not been shown as to why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute (CRC Rule 5.83(c) (4)). Accordingly, the case is hereby dismissed without prejudice.
March 06, 2019 Docket Event 1 Family - Centered Status Conference

Judge: Kalemkarian, David
March 06, 2019 Docket Event Judge Kalemkarian Minute Order. See Attached
Judicial Officer: D Kalemkarian Dept: 202 Clerk: L. Garvin Bailiff: A. Rivera Petitioner not present Respondent not present Continued to: Other: You are hereby ordered to appear in Department 202 on 6/25/2019 at 11:00 a.m., to show cause why the above-referenced case should not be dismissed. California law requires that Family Law matters proceed in an effective and timely manner from initial filing to final disposition. (Fam. Code 2450, subd. (a), and Standards of Judicial Administration, standard 5.30.) In deciding whether a case is progressing in an effective and timely manner, the Court considers procedural milestones, including the following: (A) A proof of service of summons and petition should be filed within 60 days of case initiation; (B) If no response has been filed, and the parties have not agreed on an extension of time to respond, a request to enter default should be submitted within 60 days after the date the response was due; (C) The petitioner's preliminary declaration of disclosure should be served within 60 days of the filing of the petition; (D) When a default has been entered, a judgment should be submitted within 60 days of the entry of default; (E) Whether a trial date has been requested or scheduled; and (F) When the parties have notified the court that they are actively negotiating or mediating their case, a written agreement for judgment is submitted within six months of the date the petition was filed, or a request for trial date is submitted. (Cal. Rule of Court, rule 5.83(c) (4).) The Court has reason to believe that the above-referenced case is not progressing in an effective and timely manner.
October 05, 2018 Docket Event Judge's return letter or note
September 19, 2018 Docket Event Return Letter
July 13, 2018 Docket Event Documents sent to
FLEX for judgment review with copies and SASEs.
April 04, 2018 Docket Event Documents sent to
Default shelf for default review with copies and SASE.
April 04, 2018 Docket Event Request to Enter Default
See all events
Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.