1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. California
  4. Fresno County Superior Courts
  5. Margarita Brito Vs Jose Garcia, Jr - Dismissed
SEARCH TIPS
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators
Date
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators

Contents

Details Parties Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Margarita Brito Vs Jose Garcia, Jr - Dismissed

Case Last Refreshed: 3 years ago

Track Case Changes
Download Docket Print Docket

Brito, Margarita Valdez, filed a(n) Divorce,Separation - Family case against Garcia, Jose, Jr, in the jurisdiction of Fresno County. This case was filed in Fresno County Superior Courts with Kalemkarian, David presiding.

Case Details for Brito, Margarita Valdez v. Garcia, Jose, Jr

Case Number

(Subscribe to View)

Judge

Kalemkarian, David

pdf Get Judge Analytics Report

Filing Date

December 06, 2017

Category

Dissolution - Minor Children

Last Refreshed

February 21, 2021

Practice Area

Family

Time to Dismissal Following Dispositive Motions

664 days

Filing Location

Fresno County, CA

Matter Type

Divorce,Separation

Case Outcome Type

Judgment

Case Cycle Time

664 days

Parties for Brito, Margarita Valdez v. Garcia, Jose, Jr

Plaintiffs

Brito, Margarita Valdez

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Defendants

Garcia, Jose, Jr

Other Parties

Garcia, Mateo (Minor)

Case Events for Brito, Margarita Valdez v. Garcia, Jose, Jr

Date Type Description
October 01, 2019 Docket Event Clerk's Certificate of Mailing
I certify that I am not a party to this cause and a true copy of the Minute Order filed 10/1/2019 was placed in a sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary business practice. I am readily familiar with this court's practice for collection and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid. Place of Mailing: Fresno, California on 10/4/2019. Parties served: Margarita Valdez
October 01, 2019 Docket Event Judge Kalemkarian Minute Order. See Attached
HRG: 10/1/2019 Time: 11:00 a.m. Dept: 202 Judge: D. Kalemkarian Clerk: L Garvin Reporter: Not Reported Petitioner not present Respondent not present Hearing Type: Dismissal Hearing No appearance by either party. Good cause has not been shown as to why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute (CRC Rule 5.83(c)(4).) Accordingly, the case is hereby dismissed without prejudice.
October 01, 2019 Docket Event Dismissal Hearing

Judge: Kalemkarian, David
April 09, 2019 Docket Event Dismissal Hearing

Judge: Kalemkarian, David
April 09, 2019 Docket Event Judge Kalemkarian Minute Order. See Attached
Time: 11:00 a.m. Clerk: L Garvin Reporter: Not Reported Petitioner: Present/ ProPer Respondent: Not Present Hearing Type: Other: Dismissal Hearing Continued to: 10/1/19 Time: 11:00 a.m. Dept.: 202 Issues: Dismissal Hearing Other: Petitioner is present and has been assisted by a staff member from the Self-Help Center. Good cause has been shown why the case should not be dismissed at this time. The matter is hereby continued for further dismissal hearing. Petitioner to notify the opposing party.
January 23, 2019 Docket Event 1 Family - Centered Status Conference

Judge: Tharpe, D Tyler
January 23, 2019 Docket Event Judge Kalemkarian Minute Order. See Attached
Dept: 202 Clerk: L Garvin Bailiff: A. Rivera Petitioner not present Respondent not present Continued to: Other: You are hereby ordered to appear in Department 202 on 4/9/2019 at 11:00 a.m., to show cause why the above-referenced case should not be dismissed. Other: California law requires that Family Law matters proceed in an effective and timely manner from initial filing to final disposition. (Fam. Code 2450, subd. (a), and Standards of Judicial Administration, standard 5.30.) In deciding whether a case is progressing in an effective and timely manner, the Court considers procedural milestones, including the following: (A) A proof of service of summons and petition should be filed within 60 days of case initiation; (B) If no response has been filed, and the parties have not agreed on an extension of time to respond, a request to enter default should be submitted within 60 days after the date the response was due; (C) The petitioner's preliminary declaration of disclosure should be served within 60 days of the filing of the petition; (D) When a default has been entered, a judgment should be submitted within 60 days of the entry of default; (E) Whether a trial date has been requested or scheduled; and (F) When the parties have notified the court that they are actively negotiating or mediating their case, a written agreement for judgment is submitted within six months of the date the petition was filed, or a request for trial date is submitted. (Cal. Rule of Court, rule 5.83(c) (4).) The Court has reason to believe that the above-referenced case is not progressing in an effective and timely manner.
February 14, 2018 Docket Event Proof of Service of Summons
January 04, 2018 Docket Event TRO Order to Show Cause

Judge: McGuire, Rosemary
January 04, 2018 Docket Event Judge McGuire Minute Order. See attached.
Minute order from Dept.: 304 at 9:00 a.m. Judge: R. McGuire Clerk: L. Luna Reporter: T. Alison Nature of Hearing: Order to Show Cause TRO DV Petitioner not present Respondent not present Off calendar. No appearance by either party. No proof of service. Other: No appearance by either party. Temporary Restraining dissolved immediately.
See all events
Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.