1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. California
  4. Fresno County Superior Courts
  5. Patrecia Reed Vs Jack Sconiers, Iv
SEARCH TIPS
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators
Date
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators

Contents

Details Parties Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Patrecia Reed Vs Jack Sconiers, Iv

Case Last Refreshed: 3 years ago

Track Case Changes
Download Docket Print Docket

Reed, Patrecia, filed a(n) Divorce,Separation - Family case against Sconiers, Jack Zachary, Iv, in the jurisdiction of Fresno County. This case was filed in Fresno County Superior Courts with Gamoian, Lisa presiding.

Case Details for Reed, Patrecia v. Sconiers, Jack Zachary, Iv

Case Number

(Subscribe to View)

Judge

Gamoian, Lisa

pdf Get Judge Analytics Report

Filing Date

December 06, 2017

Category

Dissolution - No Children

Last Refreshed

February 21, 2021

Practice Area

Family

Filing Location

Fresno County, CA

Matter Type

Divorce,Separation

Parties for Reed, Patrecia v. Sconiers, Jack Zachary, Iv

Plaintiffs

Reed, Patrecia

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Defendants

Sconiers, Jack Zachary, Iv

Case Events for Reed, Patrecia v. Sconiers, Jack Zachary, Iv

Date Type Description
June 30, 2020 Docket Event Dismissal Hearing

Judge: Kalemkarian, David
November 27, 2019 Docket Event 2 Family - Centered Status Conference

Judge: Kalemkarian, David
November 27, 2019 Docket Event Judge Kalemkarian Minute Order. See Attached
HRG: 11/27/2019 Judicial Officer: D Kalemkarian Dept: 202 Clerk: C. Vang Bailiff: A. Rivera Reporter: Not Reported Petitioner: Not present Respondent: Not present You are hereby ordered to appear in Department 202 on 6/30/2020 at 11:00 a.m., to show cause why the above-referenced case should not be dismissed. California law requires that Family Law matters proceed in an effective and timely manner from initial filing to final disposition. (Fam. Code 2450, subd. (a), and Standards of Judicial Administration, standard 5.30.) In deciding whether a case is progressing in an effective and timely manner, the Court considers procedural milestones, including the following: (A) A proof of service of summons and petition should be filed within 60 days of case initiation; (B) If no response has been filed, and the parties have not agreed on an extension of time to respond, a request to enter default should be submitted within 60 days after the date the response was due; (C) The petitioner's preliminary declaration of disclosure should be served within 60 days of the filing of the petition; (D) When a default has been entered, a judgment should be submitted within 60 days of the entry of default; (E) Whether a trial date has been requested or scheduled; and (F) When the parties have notified the court that they are actively negotiating or mediating their case, a written agreement for judgment is submitted within six months of the date the petition was filed, or a request for trial date is submitted. (Cal. Rule of Court, rule 5.83(c) (4).) The Court has reason to believe that the above-referenced case is not progressing in an effective and timely manner.
January 22, 2019 Docket Event Judge Kalemkarian Minute Order. See Attached
Clerk: M. Vang Bailiff: A Rivera Petitioner present Respondent not present Continued to: Next family centered case conference Date: 11/27/19 Time: 10:30 a.m. Dept.: 202 Other: Petitioner was present and has been assisted by a staff from the Self-Help Center. Matter continued for further case status conference. Petitioner to notice Respondent.
January 22, 2019 Docket Event 1 Family - Centered Status Conference

Judge: Kalemkarian, David
February 09, 2018 Docket Event Judge Gamoian Minute Order: See Attached
Hearing Date: 2/9/18 Time: 8:40 a.m. Dept: 204 Judge: L. Gamoian Clerk: S.Yang Reporter: J. Hannickel Petitioner: Not Present Respondent: Not Present Hearing Type: Other: TRO Reissued No appearance by either party Other: Temporary restraining order is terminated.
February 09, 2018 Docket Event Temporary Restraining Order Reissued

Judge: Gamoian, Lisa
December 20, 2017 Docket Event Judge Zepeda Minute Order. See Attached.
D201-J Stroud Rtp: C Felix Proof of service is unsucessful service. Court orders matter to be reissued. Court orders the Clerks Office to allow 60 days for service. Court orders the TRO to remain in full force and effect.
December 20, 2017 Docket Event Reissuance OSC/TRO
Last Hearing: 12-20-17 Reissued Hearing to: 02-09-18 @ 8:30 am in Dept 204
December 20, 2017 Docket Event TRO Order to Show Cause

Judge: Zepeda, Francine
See all events
Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.