1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. California
  4. Fresno County Superior Courts
  5. Daniel Morgan Rogers Vs Kaitlin Rose Rogers- Dismissed
SEARCH TIPS
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators
Date
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators

Contents

Details Parties Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Daniel Morgan Rogers Vs Kaitlin Rose Rogers- Dismissed

Case Last Refreshed: 3 years ago

Track Case Changes
Download Docket Print Docket

Rogers, Daniel Morgan, filed a(n) Divorce,Separation - Family case against Rogers, Kaitlin Rose, in the jurisdiction of Fresno County. This case was filed in Fresno County Superior Courts with Kalemkarian, David presiding.

Case Details for Rogers, Daniel Morgan v. Rogers, Kaitlin Rose

Case Number

(Subscribe to View)

Judge

Kalemkarian, David

pdf Get Judge Analytics Report

Filing Date

October 25, 2017

Category

Dissolution - Minor Children

Last Refreshed

February 21, 2021

Practice Area

Family

Time to Dismissal Following Dispositive Motions

496 days

Filing Location

Fresno County, CA

Matter Type

Divorce,Separation

Case Outcome Type

Judgment

Case Cycle Time

496 days

Parties for Rogers, Daniel Morgan v. Rogers, Kaitlin Rose

Plaintiffs

Rogers, Daniel Morgan

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Defendants

Rogers, Kaitlin Rose

Other Parties

Rogers, Ryan Patrick (Minor)

Case Events for Rogers, Daniel Morgan v. Rogers, Kaitlin Rose

Date Type Description
March 07, 2019 Docket Event Clerk's Certificate of Mailing
March 05, 2019 Docket Event Judge Kalemkarian Minute Order. See Attached
Time: 11:00 a.m. Dept: 202 Clerk: L. Garvin Reporter: NR Petitioner not present Respondent not present Hearing Type: Other: Dismissal Hearing No appearance by either party Other: Good cause has not been shown as to why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute (CRC Rule 5.83(c) (4)). Accordingly, the case is hereby dismissed without prejudice.
March 05, 2019 Docket Event Dismissal Hearing

Judge: Kalemkarian, David
December 11, 2018 Docket Event 1 Family - Centered Status Conference
10-25-17 jmc

Judge: Tharpe, D Tyler
December 11, 2018 Docket Event Judge Kalemkarian Minute Order. See Attached
HRG: 12/11/2018 Judicial Officer: D Kalemkarian Dept: 202 Clerk: L Garvin Bailiff: E Osornio Petitioner not present Respondent not present Continued to: Other: You are hereby ordered to appear in Department 202 on 3/5/2019 at 11:00 a.m., to show cause why the above-referenced case should not be dismissed. California law requires that Family Law matters proceed in an effective and timely manner from initial filing to final disposition. (Fam. Code 2450, subd. (a), and Standards of Judicial Administration, standard 5.30.) In deciding whether a case is progressing in an effective and timely manner, the Court considers procedural milestones, including the following: (A) A proof of service of summons and petition should be filed within 60 days of case initiation; (B) If no response has been filed, and the parties have not agreed on an extension of time to respond, a request to enter default should be submitted within 60 days after the date the response was due; (C) The petitioner's preliminary declaration of disclosure should be served within 60 days of the filing of the petition; (D) When a default has been entered, a judgment should be submitted within 60 days of the entry of default; (E) Whether a trial date has been requested or scheduled; and (F) When the parties have notified the court that they are actively negotiating or mediating their case, a written agreement for judgment is submitted within six months of the date the petition was filed, or a request for trial date is submitted. (Cal. Rule of Court, rule 5.83(c) (4).) The Court has reason to believe that the above-referenced case is not progressing in an effective and timely manner.
May 11, 2018 Docket Event Proof of Service of Summons
Served to: Kaitlin Rose Rogers
October 25, 2017 Docket Event Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act
October 25, 2017 Docket Event Property Declaration
Community & Quasi-Community Property Declaration
October 25, 2017 Docket Event Property Declaration
Separate Property Declaration
October 25, 2017 Docket Event Petition for Dissolution with Children
See all events
Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.