Case Last Refreshed: 3 years ago
Hernandez, Michelle, filed a(n) Divorce,Separation - Family case against Hernandez, Luis Enrique, in the jurisdiction of Fresno County. This case was filed in Fresno County Superior Courts with Kalemkarian, David presiding.
Case Number |
||
Filing DateSeptember 26, 2017 |
CategoryDissolution - Minor Children |
|
Last RefreshedFebruary 21, 2021 |
Practice AreaFamily |
Time to Dismissal Following Dispositive Motions490 days |
Filing LocationFresno County, CA |
Matter TypeDivorce,Separation |
|
Case Outcome TypeJudgment |
Case Cycle Time490 days |
Date | Type | Description | |
---|---|---|---|
February 11, 2019 | Docket Event | Clerk's Certificate of Mailing | |
January 29, 2019 | Docket Event |
Dismissal Hearing
Judge: Kalemkarian, David |
|
January 29, 2019 | Docket Event |
Judge Kalemkarian Minute Order. See Attached Time: 11:00 a.m. Dept: 202 Clerk: L. Garvin Reporter: NR Petitioner not present Respondent not present Hearing Type: Other: Dismissal Hearing No appearance by either party Other: Good cause has not been shown as to why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute (CRC Rule 5.83(c) (4)). Accordingly, the case is hereby dismissed without prejudice. |
|
November 13, 2018 | Docket Event |
1 Family - Centered Status Conference
Judge: Tharpe, D Tyler |
|
November 13, 2018 | Docket Event |
Judge Tharpe Minute Order. See attached. HRG: 11/13/2018 Judicial Officer: D Tharpe Dept: 202 Clerk: L. Garvin Bailiff: E Osornio Petitioner not present Respondent not present Continued to: Other: You are hereby ordered to appear in Department 202 on 1/29/2019 at 11:00 a.m., to show cause why the above-referenced case should not be dismissed. California law requires that Family Law matters proceed in an effective and timely manner from initial filing to final disposition. (Fam. Code 2450, subd. (a), and Standards of Judicial Administration, standard 5.30.) In deciding whether a case is progressing in an effective and timely manner, the Court considers procedural milestones, including the following: (A) A proof of service of summons and petition should be filed within 60 days of case initiation; (B) If no response has been filed, and the parties have not agreed on an extension of time to respond, a request to enter default should be submitted within 60 days after the date the response was due; (C) The petitioner's preliminary declaration of disclosure should be served within 60 days of the filing of the petition; (D) When a default has been entered, a judgment should be submitted within 60 days of the entry of default; (E) Whether a trial date has been requested or scheduled; and (F) When the parties have notified the court that they are actively negotiating or mediating their case, a written agreement for judgment is submitted within six months of the date the petition was filed, or a request for trial date is submitted. (Cal. Rule of Court, rule 5.83(c) (4).) The Court has reason to believe that the above-referenced case is not progressing in an effective and timely manner. |
|
September 26, 2017 | Docket Event | Income and Expense Declaration | |
September 26, 2017 | Docket Event | Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act | |
September 26, 2017 | Docket Event | Schedule of Assets | |
September 26, 2017 | Docket Event | Petition for Dissolution with Children |
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.