1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. California
  4. Fresno County Superior Courts
  5. Brandon Sandoval Vs Gina Garza Sandoval-Dismissed
SEARCH TIPS
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators
Date
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators

Contents

Details Parties Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Brandon Sandoval Vs Gina Garza Sandoval-Dismissed

Case Last Refreshed: 3 years ago

Track Case Changes
Download Docket Print Docket

Sandoval, Brandon, filed a(n) Divorce,Separation - Family case against Garza Sandoval, Gina, in the jurisdiction of Fresno County. This case was filed in Fresno County Superior Courts with Tharpe, D presiding.

Case Details for Sandoval, Brandon v. Garza Sandoval, Gina

Case Number

(Subscribe to View)

Judge

Tharpe, D

Filing Date

October 14, 2016

Category

Dissolution - Minor Children

Last Refreshed

February 21, 2021

Practice Area

Family

Filing Location

Fresno County, CA

Matter Type

Divorce,Separation

Case Outcome Type

Judgment

Case Cycle Time

410 days

Parties for Sandoval, Brandon v. Garza Sandoval, Gina

Plaintiffs

Sandoval, Brandon

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Defendants

Garza Sandoval, Gina

Other Parties

Sandoval, Sidney Aiden (Minor)

Case Events for Sandoval, Brandon v. Garza Sandoval, Gina

Date Type Description
December 29, 2017 Docket Event Clerk's Certificate of Mailing
November 28, 2017 Docket Event Dismissal Hearing

Judge: Tharpe, D Tyler
November 28, 2017 Docket Event Judge Tharpe Minute Order. See attached.
Petitioner and Respondent Not Present Hearing Type: Dismissal Hearing Other: Good cause has not been shown as to why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute (CRC Rule 5.83(c)(4).) Accordingly, the case is hereby dismissed without prejudice.
September 06, 2017 Docket Event 1 Family - Centered Status Conference

Judge: Tharpe, D Tyler
September 06, 2017 Docket Event Judge Tharpe Minute Order. See attached.
Hrg: 9/6/2017 Judicial Officer: D. Tharpe Dept: 202 Clerk: Mp Vang Bailiff: R. Harley Petitioner not present Respondent not present Continued to: Other: You are hereby ordered to appear in Department 202 on 11/28/2017, at 11:00 a.m., to show cause why the above-referenced case should not be dismissed. California law requires that Family Law matters proceed in an effective and timely manner from initial filing to final disposition. (Fam. Code 2450, subd. (a), and Standards of Judicial Administration, standard 5.30.) In deciding whether a case is progressing in an effective and timely manner, the Court considers procedural milestones, including the following: (A) A proof of service of summons and petition should be filed within 60 days of case initiation; (B) If no response has been filed, and the parties have not agreed on an extension of time to respond, a request to enter default should be submitted within 60 days after the date the response was due; (C) The petitioner's preliminary declaration of disclosure should be served within 60 days of the filing of the petition; (D) When a default has been entered, a judgment should be submitted within 60 days of the entry of default; (E) Whether a trial date has been requested or scheduled; and (F) When the parties have notified the court that they are actively negotiating or mediating their case, a written agreement for judgment is submitted within six months of the date the petition was filed, or a request for trial date is submitted. (Cal. Rule of Court, rule 5.83(c) (4).) The Court has reason to believe that the above-referenced case is not progressing in an effective and timely manner.
November 14, 2016 Docket Event Documents sent to
Sent request for waiver hrg to FLEX
November 04, 2016 Docket Event Judge Tharpe Minute Order. See attached.
Minute order from Dept: 202 at 8:30am Clerk: DCruz Reporter: WSaffery Nature of Hearing: Fee Waiver Petitioner Not Present Respondent Not Present Other: There is no appearance by Mr. Sandoval. Due to the non-appearance, the request for fee waiver is denied. Mr. Sandoval must pay all fees within 10 days from the date this minute order and FW-008 is mailed out, otherwise the Court will strike the papers you have previously filed.
November 04, 2016 Docket Event Clerk's Certificate of Mailing
November 04, 2016 Docket Event Hearing - Fee Waiver

Judge: Tharpe, D Tyler
October 26, 2016 Docket Event Proof of Service of Summons
See all events
Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.