1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. California
  4. Fresno County Superior Courts
  5. Jannett Valenzuela Vs Luis Valenzuela - Dismissed
SEARCH TIPS
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators
Date
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators

Contents

Details Parties Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Jannett Valenzuela Vs Luis Valenzuela - Dismissed

Case Last Refreshed: 3 years ago

Track Case Changes
Download Docket Print Docket

Valenzuela, Jannett Flotte, filed a(n) Divorce,Separation - Family case against Valenzuela, Luis Carlos, in the jurisdiction of Fresno County. This case was filed in Fresno County Superior Courts with Tharpe, D presiding.

Case Details for Valenzuela, Jannett Flotte v. Valenzuela, Luis Carlos

Case Number

(Subscribe to View)

Judge

Tharpe, D

Filing Date

July 31, 2015

Category

Dissolution - Minor Children

Last Refreshed

February 21, 2021

Practice Area

Family

Time to Dismissal Following Dispositive Motions

284 days

Filing Location

Fresno County, CA

Matter Type

Divorce,Separation

Case Outcome Type

Judgment

Case Cycle Time

284 days

Parties for Valenzuela, Jannett Flotte v. Valenzuela, Luis Carlos

Plaintiffs

Valenzuela, Jannett Flotte

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Defendants

Valenzuela, Luis Carlos

Other Parties

Valenzuela, Giovanna Mercedes (Minor)

Valenzuela, Sophia Loren (Minor)

Case Events for Valenzuela, Jannett Flotte v. Valenzuela, Luis Carlos

Date Type Description
May 10, 2016 Docket Event Dismissal Hearing

Judge: Tharpe, D Tyler
May 10, 2016 Docket Event Judge Tharpe Minute Order. See attached.
Minute order from Dept.: 202 Clerk: E Flores Reporter: NR Nature of Hearing: Dismissal Hearing Petitioner: Not Present Respondent: Not Present Good cause has not been shown as to why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute (CRC Rule 5.83(c)(4).) Accordingly, the case is hereby dismissed without prejudice.
May 10, 2016 Docket Event Clerk's Certificate of Mailing
March 16, 2016 Docket Event Judge Tharpe Minute Order. See attached.
Hrg: 3/16/2016 Judicial Officer: D. Tharpe Dept: 202 Clerk: M. Vang Bailiff: R. Harley Petitioner not present Respondent not present Continued to: Other: You are hereby ordered to appear in Department 202 on May 10, 2016, at 11:00 a.m., to show cause why the above-referenced case should not be dismissed. Other: California law requires that Family Law matters proceed in an effective and timely manner from initial filing to final disposition. (Fam. Code 2450, subd. (a), and Standards of Judicial Administration, standard 5.30.) In deciding whether a case is progressing in an effective and timely manner, the Court considers procedural milestones, including the following: (A) A proof of service of summons and petition should be filed within 60 days of case initiation; (B) If no response has been filed, and the parties have not agreed on an extension of time to respond, a request to enter default should be submitted within 60 days after the date the response was due; (C) The petitioner's preliminary declaration of disclosure should be served within 60 days of the filing of the petition; (D) When a default has been entered, a judgment should be submitted within 60 days of the entry of default; (E) Whether a trial date has been requested or scheduled; and (F) When the parties have notified the court that they are actively negotiating or mediating their case, a written agreement for judgment is submitted within six months of the date the petition was filed, or a request for trial date is submitted. (Cal. Rule of Court, rule 5.83(c)(4).) The Court has reason to believe that the above-referenced case is not progressing in an effective and timely manner.
March 16, 2016 Docket Event 1 Family - Centered Status Conference

Judge: Tharpe, D Tyler
September 25, 2015 Docket Event Proof of Service of Summons
July 31, 2015 Docket Event Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act
July 31, 2015 Docket Event Petition for Dissolution with Children
July 31, 2015 Docket Event Income and Expense Declaration
July 31, 2015 Docket Event Property Declaration
See all events
Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.