1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. California
  4. Fresno County Superior Courts
  5. Francine Garcia Vs Jose Cordero, Jr - Dismissed
SEARCH TIPS
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators
Date
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators

Contents

Details Parties Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Francine Garcia Vs Jose Cordero, Jr - Dismissed

Case Last Refreshed: 3 years ago

Track Case Changes
Download Docket Print Docket

Garcia, Francine Marie, filed a(n) Divorce,Separation - Family case against Cordero, Jose, Jr, in the jurisdiction of Fresno County. This case was filed in Fresno County Superior Courts with Tharpe, D presiding.

Case Details for Garcia, Francine Marie v. Cordero, Jose, Jr

Case Number

(Subscribe to View)

Judge

Tharpe, D

Filing Date

June 08, 2015

Category

Dissolution - No Children

Last Refreshed

February 21, 2021

Practice Area

Family

Time to Dismissal Following Dispositive Motions

43 days

Filing Location

Fresno County, CA

Matter Type

Divorce,Separation

Case Outcome Type

Judgment

Case Cycle Time

281 days

Parties for Garcia, Francine Marie v. Cordero, Jose, Jr

Plaintiffs

Garcia, Francine Marie

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Defendants

Cordero, Jose, Jr

Case Events for Garcia, Francine Marie v. Cordero, Jose, Jr

Date Type Description
March 15, 2016 Docket Event Clerk's Certificate of Mailing
March 15, 2016 Docket Event Judge Tharpe Minute Order. See attached.
Minute order from Dept.: 202 Clerk: E Flores Reporter: NR Nature of Hearing: Family Centered Case Status Minute Order Petitioner: Not Present Respondent: Not Present No appearance.. Good cause has not been shown as to why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute (CRC Rule 5.83(c)(4).) Accordingly, the case is hereby dismissed without prejudice.
March 15, 2016 Docket Event Dismissal Hearing

Judge: Tharpe, D Tyler
January 19, 2016 Docket Event 1 Family - Centered Status Conference

Judge: Tharpe, D Tyler
January 19, 2016 Docket Event Judge Tharpe Minute Order. See attached.
Hrg: 1/19/2016 Judicial Officer: D. Tharpe Dept: 202 Clerk: E Flores/M. Vang Bailiff: R. Harley Petitioner not present Respondent not present Continued to: You are hereby ordered to appear in Department 202 on 3/15/2016, at 11:00 a.m., to show cause why the above-referenced case should not be dismissed. Other: California law requires that Family Law matters proceed in an effective and timely manner from initial filing to final disposition. (Fam. Code 2450, subd. (a), and Standards of Judicial Administration, standard 5.30.) In deciding whether a case is progressing in an effective and timely manner, the Court considers procedural milestones, including the following: (A) A proof of service of summons and petition should be filed within 60 days of case initiation; (B) If no response has been filed, and the parties have not agreed on an extension of time to respond, a request to enter default should be submitted within 60 days after the date the response was due; (C) The petitioner's preliminary declaration of disclosure should be served within 60 days of the filing of the petition; (D) When a default has been entered, a judgment should be submitted within 60 days of the entry of default; (E) Whether a trial date has been requested or scheduled; and (F) When the parties have notified the court that they are actively negotiating or mediating their case, a written agreement for judgment is submitted within six months of the date the petition was filed, or a request for trial date is submitted. (Cal. Rule of Court, rule 5.83(c)(4).) The Court has reason to believe that the above-referenced case is not progressing in an effective and timely manner.
July 31, 2015 Docket Event Documents sent to
filing party in SASE (conformed copies of Granted default with no judgment attached)
July 21, 2015 Docket Event Request to Enter Default
As to Jose Cordero Jr.
July 21, 2015 Docket Event Declaration regarding Service of Declaration of Disclosure
July 21, 2015 Docket Event Documents sent to
Default sent to Default Shelf
June 15, 2015 Docket Event Proof of Service of Summons
See all events
Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.