The Estate Of Gisella Coleman, Deceased.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF VENTURA Probate Notes 2024PRDE023986: IN THE MATTER OF ARRETTA DELORES CARR 07/18/2024 in Department J6 Hearing on Petition For Probate Of Will And For Letters Of Administration With Will Annexed Petitioner Marlon Moss states he is a co-trustee of the trust and that Matthew Carr is the named co-trustee of the Carr Family Trust (Trusts B and C). Petitioners to provide a verified supplement of those entitled to notice pursuant to Probate Code §1208 as they are both the proposed personal representatives and the trustees of the beneficiary trust. (Probate Code §8110; §1208) Petitioners’ petition filed 04/26/24 requested appointment as administrators with will annexed. The supplement appears to now be amending the petition to a request to probate the will only and not appoint a personal representative pursuant to Probate Code §8000(a). Probate Code §8000 (a) At any time after a decedent’s death, any interested person may commence proceedings for administration of the estate of the decedent by a petition to the court for an order determining the date and place of the decedent’s death and for either or both of the following: (1) Appointment of a personal representative. (2) Probate of the decedent’s will The court intends to grant the petition to probate decedent’s will. Upon Proof of statutorily sufficient service of notice, the court intends to grant the petition and admit decedent’s will dated 02/26/16 to probate. (Probate Code §8000(a)) The court finds the petition to appoint Marlon Moss and Matthew Carr co- administrators with will annexed has been withdrawn. The Court uses Zoom exclusively for remote appearances in Department J6. For information on the Zoom procedures, and for general information regarding Judge Lund and his courtroom rules and procedures, please visit: http://www.judgerogerlund.com.

P24-01091 ESTATE OF: FELICIA PHILLIPS 9:05 AM HEARING IN RE: PETITION FOR PROBATE OF WILL AND FOR LETTERS TESTAMENTARY AND WITH IAEA FILED BY CHARLES HENRY PHILLIPS ON 6/26/24 Need: 1. Verified declaration by petitioner to include trust beneficiaries in Item # 8. PrC § 2. Proof of mailing to anyone added by verified declaration, not already served

CONSERVATORSHIP OF MAGDALENE HAYES Case Number: 23PC-0032041 This matter is on calendar for Annual Review. The Court has read and considered the report filed June 11, 2024, by the Court Investigator, which recommends that the Conservatorship continue. The report indicates that there have been no significant changes and that the Conservatorship continues to benefit the Conservatee. The Court FINDS that the Conservator is acting in the best interest of the Conservatee, and continued Conservatorship is in the best interest of the Conservatee. The Court ORDERS that the Conservatorship shall continue. The matter is set for Biennial Review on Monday, July 13, 2026, at 2:30 p.m. in Department 44. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF VENTURA Probate Notes 2024PRCE026150: IN THE MATTER OF MONICA MARY PRECIUTTI 07/19/2024 in Department J6 Hearing on Petition for Appointment of Temporary Conservator of the Person and Estate Notice of Hearing (GC-020) not filed. Five days’ service on those entitled to notice and five days’ personal service on the proposed conservatee is required. (Probate Code §2250(e)(2)) CI report not filed. Capacity declaration not filed. Continue for statutorily sufficient service of notice, Capacity Declaration and the CI report. Hearing date of 09/13/24 re the general petition remains as previously set. __________________ The Court uses Zoom exclusively for remote appearances in Department J6. For information on the Zoom procedures, and for general information regarding Judge Lund and his courtroom rules and procedures, please visit: http://www.judgerogerlund.com.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF VENTURA Probate Notes 2024PRDE019512: IN THE MATTER OF BARRY L WOLIN 07/18/2024 in Department J6 Hearing on Petition for Determination of Persons Entitled to Distribution of the Decedent's Estate The Court denies Petitioner Tiffany Van Wingerden’s request to take judicial notice of the “findings” in the conservatorship case broadly and in the court investigator’s report dated 5/9/23 specifically. No copy of the material asked to be judicially noticed was provided, and more importantly, the investigator’s alleged statement that Alan Wolin is the decedent’s only sibling cannot be accepted as indisputably true through judicial notice. (Evid. Code, § 452, subd. (d); Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1306(c); e.g., Columbia Casualty Co. v. Northwestern Nat. Ins. Co. (1991) 231 Cal.App.3d 457,473 [judicial notice of the truth of the content of court records is improper except in limited instances such as for purposes of res judicata or collateral estoppel].) The written statement of interest filed on 7/5/24 is not signed by Dan Jestic. Dan Jestic’s signature for the statement is to be filed if he wants the statement of interest to apply to him. (Prob. Code, § 11702, subd. (a) [stating “written statement of each claimant”].) Subject to the foregoing, the Court will determine that the persons entitled to distribution from the estate are Alan Wolin as to a 50% share, Randy Jestic as to a 25% share, and Randy Jestic as to a 25% share. __________________ The Court uses Zoom exclusively for remote appearances in Department J6. For information on the Zoom procedures, and for general information regarding Judge Lund and his courtroom rules and procedures, please visit: http://www.judgerogerlund.com.

CONSERVATORSHIP OF BETTE COX Case Number: 24PC-0032341 This matter is on calendar for confirmation of filing of the Determination of Appropriate Level of Care form, Care Plan, Proof of Service of Notice of Conservatee’s Rights, and Inventory and Appraisal. The Notice of Conservatee’s Rights with proof of service, Care Plan and Determination of Appropriate Level of Care form have been filed. No Inventory and Appraisal has been filed. This matter is continued to Monday, August 26, 2024, at 2:30 p.m. in Department 44 for further proceedings to confirm filing of the Inventory and Appraisal. If the document cannot be filed prior to the next hearing date, the Court ORDERS a Status Report be filed and served at least five court days before the next hearing to advise what must be accomplished before the documents can be filed. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

IN RE LAWSON Case Number: 24PB-0032418 This matter is on calendar for review regarding confirmation of receipt and acknowledgement of deposit. No “Receipt and Acknowledgment of Order for the Deposit of Money Into Blocked Account” has been filed. No status report has been filed. The parties are ordered to appear to provide the Court with a status of the deposit of the funds into a blocked account.

ESTATE OF EDWARD SEIGMUND Case Number: 23PB-0032232 This matter is on calendar for Confirmation of Filing the Inventory and Appraisal. The Inventory and Appraisal has not been filed. No Status Report has been filed. This matter is continued to Monday, August 26, 2024, at 2:30 p.m. in Department 44 for confirmation of filing of the Inventory and Appraisal. If a Final Inventory and Appraisal cannot be filed prior to the continued hearing date, the Court ORDERS a Status Report be filed and served no later than five court days before the next hearing date to advise what must be accomplished before the Final Inventory and Appraisal can be filed. Failure to file either the Final Inventory and Appraisal or the Status Report may result in the issuance of an Order to Show Cause Re Monetary Sanctions of $250.00 for failure to timely file the Inventory and Appraisal, and failure to comply with the Court’s order. The Court notes the future date of March 17, 2025 for Status of Administration. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.