1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. California
  4. Amador County Superior Courts
  5. Sauseda, Nicole Vs Sauseda, Michael Anthony Jsh
SEARCH TIPS
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators
Date
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators

Contents

Details Parties Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Sauseda, Nicole Vs Sauseda, Michael Anthony Jsh

Case Last Refreshed: 2 years ago

Track Case Changes
Download Docket Print Docket

Sauseda, Nicole, filed a(n) Domestic Violence - Family case against Sauseda, Michael Anthony, in the jurisdiction of Amador County. This case was filed in Amador County Superior Courts with Susan C. Harlan presiding.

Case Details for Sauseda, Nicole v. Sauseda, Michael Anthony

Case Number

(Subscribe to View)

Judge

Susan C. Harlan

Filing Date

October 01, 2013

Category

Family - Domestic Violence

Last Refreshed

December 10, 2021

Practice Area

Family

Filing Location

Amador County, CA

Matter Type

Domestic Violence

Parties for Sauseda, Nicole v. Sauseda, Michael Anthony

Plaintiffs

Sauseda, Nicole

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Defendants

Sauseda, Michael Anthony

Other Parties

In Pro Per (Attorney)

In Pro Per (Attorney)

Case Events for Sauseda, Nicole v. Sauseda, Michael Anthony

Date Type Description
September 18, 2014 Docket Event CALIFORNIA COURTS PROTECTIVE ORDER REGISTRY (CCPOR) UPDATED WITH FORM # ________
CALIFORNIA COURTS PROTECTIVE ORDER REGISTRY (CCPOR) UPDATED WITH FORM # DV-130
September 18, 2014 Docket Event PROOF OF SERVICE BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION AND INTERAGENCY MAIL (F) FC PROOF OF SERVICE SHERIFF DV Sent on: 09/18/2014 10:20:53.27
September 18, 2014 Docket Event RESTRAINING ORDER AFTER HEARING (CLETS-OAH) DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
September 18, 2014 Docket Event ALERT SERVED: RESTRAINED PERSON served on: 09/17/2014 For: SAUSEDA, MICHAEL ANTHONY
September 17, 2014 Docket Event CLERK'S MINUTES J GIRON:
CLERK'S MINUTES 10010: JUDGE J.S. HERMANSON BAILIFF: C CAMPBELL 9:17 A.M. Matter called. Petitioner/Mother, Nicole Sauseda, is present in pro per. Keith Morris is present appearing for Respondent/Father, Michael Sauseda, who is present and in custody. Dennis Brimer is present as court appointed counsel for the Minor Child. Discussion ensues regarding phone calls between Respondent and the Minor Child. Mr. Brimer addresses the court indicating the Minor does not want anymore phone contact with Father. Minor is 11 years old. Mr. Morris addresses the court. Discussion ensues regarding how to proceed, as Respondent is still incarcerated. As to the TRO (DV), there are no objections to a permanent order. Discussion ensues regarding allowing the Minor to decide to answer Father’s phone calls or not. Discussion ensues regarding the lizard. Father is admonished to not bring up the lizard with the Minor if he does talk to him. Father is not to use the lizard as a bargaining tool. 9:24 A.M. Petitioner is sworn and testifies as to the request for domestic violence restraining order. As there are no objections, court grants the restraining order as requested with the exception to allow phone calls between Father and the Minor, Dylan, if the minor chooses. Court finds the restraining order is necessary. Protected persons are Nicole Sauseda, Desiree Gonzeles and Dylan Sauseda. As to Dylan: Respondent may have phone calls every two weeks on Sundays between 5:00pm-6:00pm. Respondent understands he may call, but it is Dylan’s decision to speak with him or not. Personal conduct orders as requested. Stay away as requested with the caveat as to Dylan. Record unlawful communication granted as requested. Father is allowed supervised written contact with Dylan. Mother shall monitor the content and give to Minor if appropriate. Restraining order is in effect for 5 years. Mr. Morris will accept service on behalf of Respondent/Father. Mr. Brimer is relieved as counsel for Minor.
September 05, 2014 Docket Event PROOF OF SERVICE BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION AND INTERAGENCY MAIL (F) FC PROOF OF SERVICE SHERIFF DV Sent on: 09/05/2014 09:19:22.31
September 05, 2014 Docket Event NOTICE OF NEW HEARING AND ORDER ON REISSUANCE
September 05, 2014 Docket Event CALIFORNIA COURTS PROTECTIVE ORDER REGISTRY (CCPOR) UPDATED WITH FORM # ________
CALIFORNIA COURTS PROTECTIVE ORDER REGISTRY (CCPOR) UPDATED WITH FORM # DV116
September 05, 2014 Docket Event AMENDED:
AMENDED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER.
September 04, 2014 Docket Event REQUEST TO CONTINUE COURT HEARING AND REISSUE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER IN PRO PER (Attorney) on behalf of NICOLE SAUSEDA (PETITIONER)
See all events
Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.