1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. California
  4. Amador County Superior Courts
  5. Schoen, Stephanie Vs Ball, Tyler Ryan Jsh
SEARCH TIPS
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators
Date
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators

Contents

Details Parties Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Schoen, Stephanie Vs Ball, Tyler Ryan Jsh

Case Last Refreshed: 2 years ago

Track Case Changes
Download Docket Print Docket

Schoen, Stephanie, filed a(n) Domestic Violence - Family case against Ball, Tyler Ryan, in the jurisdiction of Amador County. This case was filed in Amador County Superior Courts with HERMANSON, J.S. presiding.

Case Details for Schoen, Stephanie v. Ball, Tyler Ryan

Case Number

(Subscribe to View)

Judge

HERMANSON, J.S.

Filing Date

July 05, 2013

Category

Family - Domestic Violence

Last Refreshed

October 24, 2021

Practice Area

Family

Filing Location

Amador County, CA

Matter Type

Domestic Violence

Case Cycle Time

957 days

Parties for Schoen, Stephanie v. Ball, Tyler Ryan

Plaintiffs

Schoen, Stephanie

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Defendants

Ball, Tyler Ryan

Other Parties

In Pro Per (Attorney)

In Pro Per (Attorney)

Case Events for Schoen, Stephanie v. Ball, Tyler Ryan

Date Type Description
February 17, 2016 Docket Event COPIES IN PRO PER (Attorney) on behalf of STEPHANIE SCHOEN (PETITIONER)
August 20, 2013 Docket Event CLERK'S MINUTES J GIRON:
CLERK'S MINUTES 10010: JUDGE J.S. HERMANSON BAILIFF: L. MCELFISH 2:23 P.M. Matter called. Petitioner/Respondent, Tyler Ball, is present in pro per. Respondent/Petitioner, is present in pro per. 2:24 P.M. Both parties are sworn to testify. Miss. Schoen testifies as to her request for restraining order. Mr. Ball testifies as to allegations. Discussion ensues regarding 12CR19712, People vs. Tyler Ball. Court requests the file be pulled for review. 2:39 P.M. Matter trailed. 2:53 P.M. Matter is recalled with all parties present as previously stated. Court has reviewed the criminal case and finds it was recused in it, as the court previously appeared in the action when Judge Hermanson worked for the District Attorney’s office. [Court’s Exhibit 1 (Submitted by Tyler Ball) (Transcript from Court Proceedings Pursuant to Case 12-CR-19712) is marked for identification)] Court enters a self recusal pursuant to C.C.P. § 170.1 (a)(c)(6)(ii) in the interest of justice. This matter is transferred forthwith to Department 1 before Judge Harlan. 2:54 P.M. Break. 3:16 P.M. Matter is recalled. All parties are present as previously stated. Parties have been previously sworn. Miss. Schoen again testifies. Mr. Ball again responds as to the allegations. Mr. Ball testifies as to his request for a restraining order against Miss. Schoen. Miss. Schoen responds to the allegations. Mr. Ball addresses the court as to his status in the military. Mr. Ball is in the Marines Reserve. Discussion ensues. Court finds it does not appear to have been direct violence. Court admonishes both parties for their inappropriate behavior. Discussion ensues regarding a resolution. As to 13-FC-5246, Schoen vs. Ball: Pursuant to request of Petitioner, Stephanie Schoen, the matter is dismissed with the understanding and promise of Mr. Ball that he will not contact Ms. Schoen. As to 13-FC-5279, Ball vs. Schoen: Pursuant to request of Petitioner, Tyler Ball, the matter is dismissed. Court’s Exhibit 1 is returned to Mr. Ball in court at conclusion of the hearing.
August 13, 2013 Docket Event CALIFORNIA COURTS PROTECTIVE ORDER REGISTRY (CCPOR) UPDATED WITH FORM # ________
CALIFORNIA COURTS PROTECTIVE ORDER REGISTRY (CCPOR) UPDATED WITH FORM # DV-116
August 13, 2013 Docket Event PROOF OF SERVICE BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION AND INTERAGENCY MAIL (F) FC PROOF OF SERVICE SHERIFF DV Sent on: 08/13/2013 08:58:37.76
August 12, 2013 Docket Event NOTICE OF NEW HEARING AND ORDER ON REISSUANCE
August 12, 2013 Docket Event HEARING SET: The following event: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (SHORT CAUSE HRG) FOR TRO (DV) scheduled for 08/12/2013 at 8:30 am has been rescheduled as follows: Event: CONTESTED HEARING ON OSC FOR TRO (DV) Date: 08/20/2013 Time: 2:00 pm Judge: HERMANSON, J.S. Location: DEPT 2

Judge: HERMANSON, J.S.
August 12, 2013 Docket Event CLERK'S MINUTES J GIRON:
CLERK'S MINUTES 10010: JUDGE THOMAS A SMITH BAILIFF: L. MCELFISH PETITIONER AND RESPONDENT ARE PRESENT IN PRO PER. COURT FINDS RESPONDENT FILED A RESPONSE OBJECTING TO THE REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS. COURT REISSUES THE CURRENT TRO (DV) PREVIOUSLY ISSUED AGAINST TYLER BALL. PETITIONER IS TO PREPARE AND SUBMIT THE ORDER FOR REISSUANCE FOR COURT'S SIGNATURE. TRO (DV) EXTENDED UNTIL THE NEXT HEARING. NO SERVICE IS NECESSARY, AS THE RESTRAINED PERSON IS PRESENT IN COURT WHEN THE TRO WAS REISSUED. MATTER IS CONTINUED TO AUGUST 20, 2013 AT 2:00PM FOR CONTESTED HEARING RE: REQUEST FOR RESTRAINING ORDER (DV). PETITIONER AND RESPONDENT ARE ORDERED TO BE PERSONALLY PRESENT.
August 06, 2013 Docket Event PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL TO STEPHANIE SCHOEN: RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESTRAINING ORDER IN PRO PER (Attorney) on behalf of TYLER RYAN BALL (RESPONDENT)
August 06, 2013 Docket Event RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESTRAINING ORDER IN PRO PER (Attorney) on behalf of TYLER RYAN BALL (RESPONDENT)
July 23, 2013 Docket Event CLERK'S MINUTES L WHITAKER:
CLERK'S MINUTES 10091: JUDGE: J.S. HERMANSON, BAILIFF: G. HOHN 8:47 A.M. MATTER CALLED. PETITIONER, STEPHANIE SCHOEN, IS PRESENT IN PRO PER. RESPONDENT, TYLER RYAN BALL, IS PRESENT IN PRO PER. BOTH PARTIES ARE SWORN AND TESTIFY. COURT ORDERS TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER TO REMAIN IN EFFECT PENDING THE NEXT HEARING. MATER IS CONTINUED TO AUGUST 12, 2013 AT 8:30 A.M. IN DEPARTMENT 1 AT RESPONDENT'S REQUEST.

Judge: J.S. HERMANSON
See all events
Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.