1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. California
  4. Fresno County Superior Courts
  5. Jonathan Penrose Vs Jack Gregory
SEARCH TIPS
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators
Date
"" "23STCV06307" Exact match of phrase
* negligen* Match anything after the *
( ) "motion" AND ("dismiss" OR "summary") Grouping of terms
~ "motion to dismiss"~3 Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words
AND "damages" AND "injuries" AND "relief" Both terms must appear in document
OR "modify" OR "amend" Either terms can appear in document
judge:last-name judge:Abbot Filter by a specific judge name.
party:party-name party:"Apple inc" Filter by a specific party name.
To learn more visit - https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators

Contents

Details Parties Case Events

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Jonathan Penrose Vs Jack Gregory

Case Last Refreshed: 3 years ago

Track Case Changes
Download Docket Print Docket

Penrose, Elizabeth, Penrose, Jonathan, filed a(n) Breach of Contract - Commercial case represented by Stoker, Steven R., against First American Financial Corporation, Avila, Kimberlee R., Bank Of America, Avila, John A, Gregory, Carole J, (total of 6) See All represented by Logoluso, Timothy V., Lampe, Michael J., in the jurisdiction of Fresno County. This case was filed in Fresno County Superior Courts with Snauffer, Mark presiding.

Case Details for Penrose, Elizabeth v. First American Financial Corporation , et al.

Case Number

(Subscribe to View)

Judge

Snauffer, Mark

Time To Management

129 days

Filing Date

April 01, 2011

Category

37 Unlimited - Other Contract

Time To Trial

514 days

Last Refreshed

February 21, 2021

Practice Area

Commercial

Time to Dismissal Following Dispositive Motions

109 days

Filing Location

Fresno County, CA

Matter Type

Breach of Contract

Case Outcome Type

Judgment

Case Cycle Time

1503 days

Parties for Penrose, Elizabeth v. First American Financial Corporation , et al.

Plaintiffs

Penrose, Elizabeth

Penrose, Jonathan

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Stoker, Steven R.

Defendants

First American Financial Corporation

Avila, Kimberlee R.

Bank Of America

Avila, John A

Gregory, Carole J

Gregory, Jack P

Attorneys for Defendants

Logoluso, Timothy V.

Lampe, Michael J.

Other Parties

Avila, John A. (Plaintiff In 1st Cross Complaint)

Avila, Kimberlee R. (Plaintiff In 1st Cross Complaint)

First American Title Company (Plaintiff In 2nd Cross Complaint)

Jack P. Gregory And Carole J. Gregory, Trustees Of Jack And (Plaintiff In 1st Cross Complaint)

Lampe, Michael J. (Attorney)

Logoluso, Timothy V. (Attorney)

Logoluso, Timothy V. (Attorney)

Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group, Inc. (Defendant In 1st Cross Complaint)

Watson, Thomas T. (Attorney)

Case Events for Penrose, Elizabeth v. First American Financial Corporation , et al.

Date Type Description
August 03, 2015 Docket Event Minute Order Attachment
August 03, 2015 Docket Event CRC 3.1385 After Settlement
April 13, 2015 Docket Event Notice Filed
Notice of Partial Settlement
April 13, 2015 Docket Event Jury Trial
per 7/19 T/R ,lp

Judge: Hamilton, Jeffrey Y.
April 10, 2015 Docket Event Trial Readiness
continued per 7-26-11 tentative mmm

Judge: Snauffer, Mark
April 08, 2015 Docket Event Civil Document
Notice of Settlement filed
Unconditional settlement reached and filed. Project completion date: 5/26/15
March 26, 2015 Docket Event Demurrer
owdem 738-5975 lp checked on 8/31/11 by lmi

Judge: Snauffer, Mark
March 25, 2015 Docket Event Certificate of mailing
I certify that I am not a party to this cause and a true copy of the Minute Order/ Tentative Ruling was placed in a sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary business practice. I am readily familiar with this court's practice for collection and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid. Place of Mailing: Fresno, California on . Parties served: lmw
March 25, 2015 Docket Event Minute order - Judge Snauffer
Minute Order from Dept.: 501 Clerk: L. Whipple Reporter: N/R Nature of Hearing:Summary Judgment Taken out from under advisement Tentative ruling becomes the order of the court. No further order is necessary. Pursuant to CRC 391(a) and CCP section 1019.5(a), no further order is necessary. The minute order adopting the tentative ruling serves as the order of the court. Service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order. See attached copy of Tentative Ruling. To deny the motion by First American Title Company, and to grant the motion by Jack Gregory, Carole Gregory, John Avila, and Kimberlee Avila for summary adjudication of the second, third, and fourth causes of action. The evidentiary objections of First American Title Company are overruled as irrelevant because it did not meet its burden. The Court has not considered the reply separate statement of facts submitted by Jack Gregory, Carole Gregory, John Avila, and Kimberlee Avila. There is no statutory provision permitting supplemental separate statements or additional evidence to be filed with the reply. (Code Civ. Proc. 437c, subd. (b)(4); San Diego Watercrafts v. Wells Fargo Bank (2002) 102 Cal.App.4th 308, 312-316.) The evidentiary objections of Jack Gregory, Carole Gregory, John Avila, and Kimberlee Avila are overruled as irrelevant, because the Court did not rely on the evidence objected to in finding there was no triable issue of material fact. Further, the format of the evidentiary objections did not comply with California Rules of Court, rule 3.1354, nor were the evidentiary objections accompanied by a proposed order. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1354(c).) lmw
March 25, 2015 Docket Event Mand. Settlement Conf. Minutes
Judge/Temporary Judge: ADR Dept./Location: Scott Laird, Esq. Clerk: N/A Reporter: N/R Mandatory Settlement Conference - not settled. Trial date of 4/13/15 remains set. Parties are ordered to meet and confer. Parties are to report to Dept. 501 at 9:30 a.m. for their Trial Readiness hearing on April 10, 2015 and are ordered to adhere to the Meet & Confer Local Rules of the Court 2.5.1, 2.53, 2.55, 2.5.8, 2.6 rls
See all events
Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.