Texas Administrative Code|§13.7 Maximum Funding Requests and Minimum Number of MFDL Units

                                                

(a) Maximum Funding Request. The maximum funding request for an Application will be identified in the NOFA, and may vary by development type, set-aside, or fund source. (b) Maximum New Construction or Reconstruction Per-Unit Subsidy Limits. While more restrictive per-Unit subsidy caps are allowable and incentivized as point scoring items in 10 TAC §13.6 of this chapter (relating to Scoring Criteria) or, the per-Unit subsidy limit for a Development will be determined by the Department as the Section 234 Condo limits with the applicable high cost percentage adjustment in effect at the start date of the NOFA, which are the maximum MFDL eligible cost per-Unit subsidy limits that an Applicant may use to determine the amount of MFDL funds combined with other federal funds that may subsidize a Unit. (c) Maximum Rehabilitation Per-Unit Subsidy Limits. The MFDL eligible cost per-Unit to rehabilitate a Development may not exceed the HUD 221(d)(4) statutory limits, subject to high cost factors as published in the NOFA. (d) Minimum Number of MFDL Units. The minimum required number of MFDL Units will be determined by the MFDL per-Unit subsidy limits and the cost allocation analysis, which will ensure the amount of MFDL Units as a percentage of total Units is equal to or greater than the percentage of MFDL funds requested as a percentage of total eligible MFDL Development costs. Applicants may be able to estimate the minimum number of MFDL Units by entering Application information into the Direct Loan Unit Calculator Tool available on the Department's website, but this tool might not cover the specific requirements of every Application. A larger number of Units may also be required if scoring is utilized.

Source Note: The provisions of this §13.7 adopted to be effective November 26, 2020, 45 TexReg 8316
Previous Section

Doc thumbnail §13.6 Scoring Criteria

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 8 pages

FILED 5/11/2021 4:20 PM 1 CIT-ESERVE FELICIA PITR …

Case Filed

May 11, 2021

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Dallas County, TX

Filed Date

May 11, 2021

Judge Hon. HOFFMAN, MARTIN Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for HOFFMAN, MARTIN
preview-icon 5 pages

FILED 3/29/2024 10:33 AM FELICIA PITRE DISTRICT CLERK …

Case Filed

Mar 29, 2024

Case Status

OPEN

County

Dallas County, TX

Filed Date

Mar 29, 2024

Judge Hon. HOFFMAN, MARTIN Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for HOFFMAN, MARTIN
preview-icon 6 pages

Dec. 2. 2009 4:12PM No. 3539 P. 3 Cause NO. 67-233025-08 RICKY J, PICKLE, Individually, and § IN THE DISTRICT COURT d/b/a RJ PICKLE & ASSOCIATES, CPA's § § …

Case Filed

Sep 29, 2008

Case Status

FINAL JUDGMENT AFTER NON-JURY TRIAL

County

Tarrant County, TX

Filed Date

Dec 02, 2009

preview-icon 16 pages

PRO PAVERS, LLC, § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF , § § v. § § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS BRA…

Case Filed

May 26, 2016

Case Status

Disposed (Final)

County

Harris County, TX

Filed Date

Jul 12, 2019

Category

Debt/Contract - Debt/Contract

Judge Hon. STEVEN KIRKLAND Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for STEVEN KIRKLAND
preview-icon 9 pages

5/15/2023 11:47 AM Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County Envelope No. 75631498 2023-29902 / Court: 152 By: Wanda Chambers Filed…

Case Filed

May 15, 2023

Case Status

Active - Civil

County

Harris County, TX

Filed Date

May 15, 2023

Category

SWORN ACCOUNT

Judge Hon. ROBERT K. SCHAFFER Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for ROBERT K. SCHAFFER
View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope