Ohio Revised Code|Section 2945.21 | Peremptory challenges.

                                                

(A)(1) In criminal cases in which there is only one defendant, each party, in addition to the challenges for cause authorized by law, may peremptorily challenge three of the jurors in misdemeanor cases and four of the jurors in felony cases other than capital cases. If there is more than one defendant, each defendant may peremptorily challenge the same number of jurors as if he were the sole defendant.

(2) Notwithstanding Criminal Rule 24, in capital cases in which there is only one defendant, each party, in addition to the challenges for cause authorized by law, may peremptorily challenge twelve of the jurors. If there is more than one defendant, each defendant may peremptorily challenge the same number of jurors as if he were the sole defendant.

(3) In any case in which there are multiple defendants, the prosecuting attorney may peremptorily challenge a number of jurors equal to the total number of peremptory challenges allowed to all of the defendants.

(B) If any indictments, informations, or complaints are consolidated for trial, the consolidated cases shall be considered, for purposes of exercising peremptory challenges, as though the defendants or offenses had been joined in the same indictment, information, or complaint.

(C) The exercise of peremptory challenges authorized by this section shall be in accordance with the procedures of Criminal Rule 24.

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 9 pages

JAMES FREDERICK Plaintiff vs. JASON SCHUTTE Defendant SILER C suet CLERK OF cold Up COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CIVIL DIVISION BUTLER COUNTY, OHIO Case #: CV 2010 06 2543 Judge: Andrew Nastoff MEMORANDUM CONTRA TO DEFENDANT SCHUTTE’S MOTION TO BIFURCATE Now Comes Plaintiff, James Frederick, by and through counsel and move this Court for an order overruling the Defendant’s Motion to Bifurcate Punitive Damages. In the interest of justice and judicial economy, this Court should not bifurcate…

County

Butler County, OH

Filed Date

Sep 07, 2010

Judge Hon. Andrew Nastoff Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Andrew Nastoff
preview-icon 10 pages

2¢p NEL M. HORRIGAN DEC 22 PHI2: 29 UiiMiT COUNT ERK CF COU! IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS SUMMIT COUNTY, OHIO LENDON HINKLE, ) CASE NO. CV-2008-02-1086 ) Plaintiff, ) JUDGE BRENDA BURNHAM UNRUH ) v. ) ) PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE IN ROGER POSTLETHWAITE, ) OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S ) MOTION TO BIFURCATE AND Defendant. ) MOTION IN LIMINE Plaintiff, by and through undersigned counsel, respectfully requests that this Court deny Defendant's Motion to Bifurcate and Motion in Limine. The decision…

Case Filed

Feb 04, 2008

County

Summit County, OH

Filed Date

Dec 22, 2008

Category

OTHER TORT

preview-icon 25 pages

i FIL coURT OF APPEALS 2ISHAY~8 PY 3:05 PERK OF COURTS MOW ony CO, OHIO COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO * FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY . SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO CASE NUMBER: CA 028167 PLAINTIFF/APPELLEE CHRIS EPLEY, COUNSEL FOR THE STATE Pal Se OND STR TT SUITE 00 TRIAL COURT CASE NO. TRD 1803232 DAYTON, OHIO 45402 937-228-7511 Vi APPELLANT’S REPLACEMENT JIM M. RUSSELL, PRO SE BRIEF DEFENDANT/APPELLANT 2037 WASHINGTON CREEK LANE DAYTON, OHIO 45458 “423-315-0469 : OR…

Case Filed

Oct 03, 2018

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

May 08, 2019

Category

NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED

View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope