Ohio Revised Code|Section 2151.415 | Motion for order of disposition upon termination of temporary custody order.

                                                

(A) Except for cases in which a motion for permanent custody described in division (D)(1) of section 2151.413 of the Revised Code is required to be made, a public children services agency or private child placing agency that has been given temporary custody of a child pursuant to section 2151.353 of the Revised Code, not later than thirty days prior to the earlier of the date for the termination of the custody order pursuant to division (H) of section 2151.353 of the Revised Code or the date set at the dispositional hearing for the hearing to be held pursuant to this section, shall file a motion with the court that issued the order of disposition requesting that any of the following orders of disposition of the child be issued by the court:

(1) An order that the child be returned home and the custody of the child's parents, guardian, or custodian without any restrictions;

(2) An order for protective supervision;

(3) An order that the child be placed in the legal custody of a relative or other interested individual;

(4) An order permanently terminating the parental rights of the child's parents;

(5) An order that the child be placed in a planned permanent living arrangement;

(6) In accordance with division (D) of this section, an order for the extension of temporary custody.

(B) Upon the filing of a motion pursuant to division (A) of this section, the court shall hold a dispositional hearing on the date set at the dispositional hearing held pursuant to section 2151.35 of the Revised Code, with notice to all parties to the action in accordance with the Juvenile Rules. After the dispositional hearing or at a date after the dispositional hearing that is not later than one year after the earlier of the date on which the complaint in the case was filed or the child was first placed into shelter care, the court, in accordance with the best interest of the child as supported by the evidence presented at the dispositional hearing, shall issue an order of disposition as set forth in division (A) of this section, except that all orders for permanent custody shall be made in accordance with sections 2151.413 and 2151.414 of the Revised Code. In issuing an order of disposition under this section, the court shall comply with section 2151.42 of the Revised Code.

(C)(1) If an agency pursuant to division (A) of this section requests the court to place a child into a planned permanent living arrangement, the agency shall present evidence to indicate why a planned permanent living arrangement is appropriate for the child, including, but not limited to, evidence that the agency has tried or considered all other possible dispositions for the child. A court shall not place a child in a planned permanent living arrangement, unless it finds, by clear and convincing evidence, that a planned permanent living arrangement is in the best interest of the child, that the child is sixteen years of age or older, and that one of the following exists:

(a) The child, because of physical, mental, or psychological problems or needs, is unable to function in a family-like setting and must remain in residential or institutional care.

(b) The parents of the child have significant physical, mental, or psychological problems and are unable to care for the child because of those problems, adoption is not in the best interest of the child, as determined in accordance with division (D)(1) of section 2151.414 of the Revised Code, and the child retains a significant and positive relationship with a parent or relative;

(c) The child has been counseled on the permanent placement options available, is unwilling to accept or unable to adapt to a permanent placement, and is in an agency program preparing for independent living.

(2) If the court issues an order placing a child in a planned permanent living arrangement, both of the following apply:

(a) The court shall issue a finding of fact setting forth the reasons for its finding;

(b) The agency may make any appropriate placement for the child and shall develop a case plan for the child that is designed to assist the child in finding a permanent home outside of the home of the parents.

(D)(1) If an agency pursuant to division (A) of this section requests the court to grant an extension of temporary custody for a period of up to six months, the agency shall include in the motion an explanation of the progress on the case plan of the child and of its expectations of reunifying the child with the child's family, or placing the child in a permanent placement, within the extension period. The court shall schedule a hearing on the motion, give notice of its date, time, and location to all parties and the guardian ad litem of the child, and at the hearing consider the evidence presented by the parties and the guardian ad litem. The court may extend the temporary custody order of the child for a period of up to six months, if it determines at the hearing, by clear and convincing evidence, that the extension is in the best interest of the child, there has been significant progress on the case plan of the child, and there is reasonable cause to believe that the child will be reunified with one of the parents or otherwise permanently placed within the period of extension. In determining whether to extend the temporary custody of the child pursuant to this division, the court shall comply with section 2151.42 of the Revised Code. If the court extends the temporary custody of the child pursuant to this division, upon request it shall issue findings of fact.

(2) Prior to the end of the extension granted pursuant to division (D)(1) of this section, the agency that received the extension shall file a motion with the court requesting the issuance of one of the orders of disposition set forth in divisions (A)(1) to (5) of this section or requesting the court to extend the temporary custody order of the child for an additional period of up to six months. If the agency requests the issuance of an order of disposition under divisions (A)(1) to (5) of this section or does not file any motion prior to the expiration of the extension period, the court shall conduct a hearing in accordance with division (B) of this section and issue an appropriate order of disposition. In issuing an order of disposition, the court shall comply with section 2151.42 of the Revised Code.

If the agency requests an additional extension of up to six months of the temporary custody order of the child, the court shall schedule and conduct a hearing in the manner set forth in division (D)(1) of this section. The court may extend the temporary custody order of the child for an additional period of up to six months if it determines at the hearing, by clear and convincing evidence, that the additional extension is in the best interest of the child, there has been substantial additional progress since the original extension of temporary custody in the case plan of the child, there has been substantial additional progress since the original extension of temporary custody toward reunifying the child with one of the parents or otherwise permanently placing the child, and there is reasonable cause to believe that the child will be reunified with one of the parents or otherwise placed in a permanent setting before the expiration of the additional extension period. In determining whether to grant an additional extension, the court shall comply with section 2151.42 of the Revised Code. If the court extends the temporary custody of the child for an additional period pursuant to this division, upon request it shall issue findings of fact.

(3) Prior to the end of the extension of a temporary custody order granted pursuant to division (D)(2) of this section, the agency that received the extension shall file a motion with the court requesting the issuance of one of the orders of disposition set forth in divisions (A)(1) to (5) of this section. Upon the filing of the motion by the agency or, if the agency does not file the motion prior to the expiration of the extension period, upon its own motion, the court, prior to the expiration of the extension period, shall conduct a hearing in accordance with division (B) of this section and issue an appropriate order of disposition. In issuing an order of disposition, the court shall comply with section 2151.42 of the Revised Code.

(4) No court shall grant an agency more than two extensions of temporary custody pursuant to division (D) of this section and the court shall not order an existing temporary custody order to continue beyond two years after the date on which the complaint was filed or the child was first placed into shelter care, whichever date is earlier, regardless of whether any extensions have been previously ordered pursuant to division (D) of this section.

(E) After the issuance of an order pursuant to division (B) of this section, the court shall retain jurisdiction over the child until the child attains the age of eighteen if the child does not have a developmental disability or physical impairment, the child attains the age of twenty-one if the child has a developmental disability or physical impairment, or the child is adopted and a final decree of adoption is issued, unless the court's jurisdiction over the child is extended pursuant to division (F) of section 2151.353 of the Revised Code.

(F) The court, on its own motion or the motion of the agency or person with legal custody of the child, the child's guardian ad litem, or any other party to the action, may conduct a hearing with notice to all parties to determine whether any order issued pursuant to this section should be modified or terminated or whether any other dispositional order set forth in divisions (A)(1) to (5) of this section should be issued. After the hearing and consideration of all the evidence presented, the court, in accordance with the best interest of the child, may modify or terminate any order issued pursuant to this section or issue any dispositional order set forth in divisions (A)(1) to (5) of this section. In rendering a decision under this division, the court shall comply with section 2151.42 of the Revised Code.

(G) If the court places a child in a planned permanent living arrangement with a public children services agency or a private child placing agency pursuant to this section, the agency with which the child is placed in a planned permanent living arrangement shall not remove the child from the residential placement in which the child is originally placed pursuant to the case plan for the child or in which the child is placed with court approval pursuant to this division, unless the court and the guardian ad litem are given notice of the intended removal and the court issues an order approving the removal or unless the removal is necessary to protect the child from physical or emotional harm and the agency gives the court notice of the removal and of the reasons why the removal is necessary to protect the child from physical or emotional harm immediately after the removal of the child from the prior setting.

(H) If the hearing held under this section takes the place of an administrative review that otherwise would have been held under section 2151.416 of the Revised Code, the court at the hearing held under this section shall do all of the following in addition to any other requirements of this section:

(1) Determine the continued necessity for and the appropriateness of the child's placement;

(2) Determine the extent of compliance with the child's case plan;

(3) Determine the extent of progress that has been made toward alleviating or mitigating the causes necessitating the child's placement in foster care;

(4) Project a likely date by which the child may be returned to the child's home or placed for adoption or legal guardianship;

(5) Approve the permanency plan for the child consistent with section 2151.417 of the Revised Code.




The Legislative Service Commission presents the text of this section as a composite of the section as amended by multiple acts of the General Assembly. This presentation recognizes the principle stated in R.C. 1.52(B) that amendments are to be harmonized if reasonably capable of simultaneous operation.


View Latest Documents

preview-icon 6 pages

)i uae | EM gh \\ + INETHE:COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO IN RE: M.O. and E.0., Ill C.A. CASE NO. 25965 T.C.NO. 2009-4636 2009-4637 (Civil appeal from Common Pleas Court, Juvenile Division) OPINION Rendered on the 11th day of July, 2014. MICHELLE D. PHIPPS, Atty. Reg. No. 0069829, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, 301 W. Third Street, 5"* Floor, Dayton, Ohio 45422 Attorney for Plaintiff-Appellant ELIZABETH C. SCOTT, Atty. Reg. No. 0076045, 120 W. Second Street, Suite…

Case Filed

Oct 20, 2013

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Jul 11, 2014

Category

NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED

preview-icon 5 pages

5 (Cictontennen anys way bP 3:09 prec dye bet ‘ “eUHTY IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO JUVENILE a) lb IN RE: : CASE NO.: JC-05-6465 C.M. : (Judge Kuntz) NOTICE OF APPEAL Appellant, C. M., by and through counsel, hereby gives notice of his appeal to the Court of Appeals of Montgomery County, Ohio, Second Appellate District, from the final judgment rendered in the above-captioned case by this Court. Respectfully submitted, LAW OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER BARBA…

Case Filed

Nov 13, 2005

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Nov 14, 2005

Category

NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED

preview-icon 11 pages

D9166 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL Case # 9CVF 7 11424 Y21 Karen M Domungo-Bennett 7040 TRILLIUM LANE REYNOLDSBURG, OH 43068-4837 Vs 880 EAST 11™ AVENUE HUD/HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT & CMHA/COLS METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY/SEC 8 DEPT ‘COLUMBUS, OH 43211 200 NORTH HIGH STREET. 7™ FLOOR COLUMBUS, OH 43215 FORMAL COMPLAINT On July 2. 2009, an informal hearing was scheduled concerning the possible termination of my Section 8 Assistance. Al…

Case Name 09 CV 011424
Case Filed

Jul 30, 2009

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Franklin County, OH

Judge Hon. KIMBERLY COCROFT Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for KIMBERLY COCROFT
preview-icon 7 pages

PSION 2000HAR-S PH [23] ceca Chriri Ge PLEAS “MONTGOMERY COUNTY IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO JUVENILE DIVISION CAAaISIT IN RE: : CASE NO.: 06-JC-301 AARON D. BROWN : (Judge Capizzi) NOTICE OF APPEAL Appellant, Aaron D. Brown, by and through counsel, hereby gives notice of his appeal to the Court of Appeals of Montgomery County, Ohio, Second Appellate District, from the final judgment rendered in the above-captioned case by this Court. Respectfully submitted, LAW OF…

Case Filed

Mar 08, 2006

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Mar 09, 2006

Category

NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED

preview-icon 14 pages

| ificrnomy IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO : C.A. CASE NOS. CA 22512 IN RE: CA 22513 : CA 22514 c.H., S.W., & MW. T.C. CASE NOS.02-JC-9638 00-s¢-6584 00-Jc-6583 (Civil Appeal From Common Pleas Court) OPINION Rendered on the qind day of Auavict , 2008. Mare N. Greenberg, Atty. Reg. No. 0077480, 580 Lincoln Park Blvd., Suite 399, Kettering, OH 45429 Attorney for Appellant Johnna Shia, Atty. Reg. No. 0067685, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, Montgomery County Prosecuto…

Case Filed

Nov 19, 2007

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Aug 22, 2008

Category

NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED

View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope