Ohio Administrative Code|Rule 4901:1-38-05 | Unique arrangements.

                                                

(A) Notwithstanding rules 4901:1-38-03
and 4901:1-38-04 of the Administrative Code, an electric utility may file an
application pursuant to section 4905.31 of the Revised Code for commission
approval of a unique arrangement with one or more of its non-mercantile
customers, consumers, or employees.

(1) An electric utility
filing an application for commission approval of a unique arrangement with one
or more of its customers, consumers, or employees bears the burden of proof
that the proposed arrangement is reasonable and does not violate the provisions
of sections 4905.33 and 4905.35 of the Revised Code, and shall submit to the
commission verifiable information detailing the rationale for the
arrangement.

(2) Upon the filing of an
application for a unique arrangement, the commission may fix a time and place
for a hearing if the application appears to be unjust or
unreasonable.

(3) The unique
arrangement shall be subject to change, alteration, or modification by the
commission.

(B) If a mercantile customer, or a group
of mercantile customers, of an electric utility is not eligible for an
arrangement under rule 4901:1-38-03 or 4901:1-38-04 of the Administrative Code,
the customer may file an application for commission approval of a unique
arrangement with the electric utility.

(1) Each customer
requesting to take service pursuant to a unique arrangement with the electric
utility has the burden of proof that, at a minimum:

(a) The customer and/or
electric utility is not eligible for an economic development arrangement under
rule 4901:1-38-03 of the Administrative Code.

(b) The customer and/or
electric utility is not eligible for an energy efficiency arrangement under
rule 4901:1-38-04 of the Administrative Code.

(c) The arrangement is in
the public interest.

Further, the customer will submit to the
electric utility and the commission verifiable information detailing how the
criteria are met, and provide an affidavit from a company official as to the
veracity of the information provided.

(2) A mercantile customer
filing an application for commission approval of a unique arrangement has the
burden of proof that the proposed arrangement is reasonable and does not
violate the provisions of sections 4905.33 and 4905.35 of the Revised Code, and
shall submit to the commission and the electric utility verifiable information
detailing the rationale for the arrangement.

(3) Upon the filing of an
application for a unique arrangement, the commission may fix a time and place
for a hearing if the application appears to be unjust or
unreasonable.

(4) The unique
arrangement shall be subject to change, alteration, or modification by the
commission.

(C) Each applicant applying for approval
of a unique arrangement shall describe how such arrangement furthers the policy
of the state of Ohio embodied in section 4928.02 of the Revised
Code.

(D) Unique arrangements shall reflect
terms and conditions for circumstances for which the electric utility's
tariffs have not already provided.

(E) Customer information provided to the
electric utility to obtain a unique arrangement shall be treated by the
electric utility as confidential. The electric utility shall request
confidential treatment of customer-specific information that is filed with the
commission, with the exception of customer names and addresses.

(F) Affected parties may file a motion to
intervene and file comments and objections to any application filed under this
rule within twenty days of the date of the filing of the
application.



Last updated July 26, 2021 at 9:22 AM


View Latest Documents

preview-icon 5 pages

NAILAH K. BYRD CUYAHOGA COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 Court of Common Pleas ANSWER OF... July 7,2023 16:44 …

County

Cuyahoga County, OH

Filed Date

Jul 07, 2023

Judge Hon. SHANNON M GALLAGHER Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for SHANNON M GALLAGHER
preview-icon 6 pages

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ot DELAWARE COUNTY, OHIO 5 CIVIL DIVISION ul : Thomas L. Meyer, et al Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 11-CVH-02-0184 ve. a 8 4 Judge Whitney > = ‘ Columbus Souther Power Company et al, = S= Q = = — Defendants. me a =5 2 S$ = REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT 2 3 co COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTIO In their Complaint, Plaintiffs claim that damage to household items caused by a 2 substantial voltage of electr…

County

Delaware County, OH

Filed Date

Jun 15, 2011

Category

(CV) CIVIL COMMON PLEAS

Judge

WHITNEY, W. DUNCAN

preview-icon 3 pages

Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2013 Nov 01 4:44 PM-12CV004492 OB456 - S45 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, FRANKLIN COUNTY OHIO CIVIL DIVISION INEZ VALINTINE Plaintiff -Vs- Case No. 12CV-04492 JUDGE DAVID CAIN CRYSTAL D. COLLINS et.al, Defendant MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER NOW comes Plaintiff, by and through her counsel, w ho moves this court for a Protective Order, for the depositions of the Independent Medical Examiner scheduled for November 8,2013. A memorandum i…

Case Name 12 CV 004492
Case Filed

Apr 09, 2012

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Franklin County, OH

Filed Date

Nov 01, 2013

Judge Hon. KAREN PHIPPS Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for KAREN PHIPPS
preview-icon 5 pages

rowstndve Townsend 0 “" og egg Pi (eet Case Number: 2010 DR 01116 5 Compe. .. FILED ° +3 COURT 2011 0EC 28 AM 9: 3% GREGORY A, 4 CLERK OF Bou Se IN THE COMMON pLEAg COUR “O1 MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO DIVISION OF D ‘STIC RELATIONS Case Number: 10 DR 01116 Kevin Townsend * 5461 Idlewood Road * Dayton, Ohio 45432 * Judge: Denise L. Cross * Plaintiff * * -Vs- * * Molly Christine Townsend * PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO 123 West Antler Avenue, Apartment 3 * COMPEL DISCOVERY Redmond, Oregon 97756 * * Def…

Case Filed

Oct 14, 2010

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Dec 28, 2011

Category

DIVORCE WITH CHILDREN

preview-icon 9 pages

i SF ye IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS DELAWARE COUNTY, OHIO CIVIL DIVISION Thomas L. Meyer, et al : & 3 Plaintiffs, =a oF Civil Action No. 11-CVH-02-0184> v. ' Judge Whitney Columbus Southern Power Company et al, O18 ild ezay & Defendants. DEFENDANT COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION Defendant Columbus Southern Power which does business as American Electric Power (herein after referred to as “AEP”), respectfully mov…

County

Delaware County, OH

Filed Date

May 23, 2011

Category

(CV) CIVIL COMMON PLEAS

Judge

WHITNEY, W. DUNCAN

View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope