Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and will be able to access it on trellis. You can always see your envelopes by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner.
Your subscription has successfully been upgraded.
(A) Beginning with the local report card
released for the 2012-2013 school year, the local report card shall include a
graded performance measure known as performance indicators. This measure shall
use the performance indicators established in section 3302.02 of the Revised
Code.(B) Each performance indicator
demonstrates what percentage of students in a school district or building
scored at least proficient on state assessments, or achieved a prescribed level
of performance for other specified goals. If a school district or building
achieves the expected level of performance outlined by this section, the school
or district is considered to have met the indicator. The grade for this measure
shall be the percentage of applicable performance indicators met out of the
total applicable performance indicators possible.(C) The department shall assign a letter
grade for the performance indicators performance measure using the following
performance benchmarks:(1) "A" for
scores greater than or equal to ninety per cent;(2) "B" for
scores greater than or equal to eighty per cent but less than ninety per
cent;(3) "C" for
scores greater than or equal to seventy per cent but less than eighty per
cent;(4) "D" for
scores greater than or equal to fifty per cent but less than seventy per cent;
and(5) "F" for
scores less than fifty per cent.(D) For any performance indicator based
on the percentage of students attaining a proficient score on the assessments
prescribed by divisions (A) and (B)(1) of section 3301.0710 of the Revised
Code, a school district or building shall be considered to have met the
indicator if:(1) For the local report
card released for the 2012-2013 school year, at least seventy-five per cent of
the tested students score proficient or higher on the assessment.(2) For the local report
card released for the 2013-2014 school year, at least eighty per cent of the
tested students score proficient or higher on the assessment.(E) For the local report card released
for the 2014-2015 school year, a school district or building shall be
considered to have met the indicator if(1) At least eighty per
cent of the tested students score proficient or higher on the English language
arts assessment prescribed by division (A)(1)(a) of section 3301.0710 of the
Revised Code.(2) At least eighty per
cent of the tested students score proficient or higher on the assessments
prescribed by division (B)(1) of section 3301.0710 of the Revised
Code.(3) The percentage of
tested students scoring proficient or higher on the mathematics assessment
prescribed by division (A)(1)(a) of section 3301.0710 of the Revised Code, the
assessments prescribed by divisions (A)(1)(b) to (A)(1)(f) of section 3301.0710
of the Revised Code, and the end-of-course assessments prescribed by division
(B)(2) of section 3301.0712 of the Revised Code is greater than or equal to the
statewide proficiency percentage for each respective assessment. The
proficiency percentage required to meet the indicators described in paragraph
(E)(3) of this rule shall not exceed eighty per cent. In cases where the
statewide proficiency percentage for an assessment is greater than eighty per
cent, the proficiency percentage required for a school district or building to
meet the indicator shall be set to eighty per cent.(F) For the local report card
released for the 2015-2016 school year, a school district or building shall be
considered to have met the indicator if:(1) The
percentage of tested students scoring proficient or higher on the end-of-course
assessments prescribed by division (B)(2) of section 3301.0712 of the Revised
Code is greater than or equal to half the difference between statewide
proficiency percentage for 2014-2015 and eighty per cent for each respective
assessment. The proficiency percentage required to meet the indicators
described in paragraph (F)(1) of this rule shall not exceed eighty per cent. In
cases where the statewide proficiency percentage for an assessment is greater
than eighty per cent, the proficiency percentage required for a school district
or building to meet the indicator shall be set to eighty per cent.(G) For the local report card
released for the 2016-2017 school year and each school year thereafter, a
school district shall be considered to have met the indicator if at least
eighty per cent of the tested students score proficient or higher on the
assessment.(H) Notwithstanding
paragraphs (D) and (E)(2) of this rule, the performance indicators for
assessments prescribed by division (B)(1) of section 3301.0710 of the Revised
Code as only administered to eleventh grade students shall be considered met if
at least eighty-five per cent of the tested students score proficient or higher
on the assessments.
fom aro E0181 - 75 a % % Wo, IN THE COURT OF COMMON FLEAS, <p, @,, ae, FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO y. 4 > % iw) STATE OF OHIO ex rel., : “hy BUCCIERE FINANCIAL INC., ct al., Plaintiffs /Relators, : CASE NO. 10 CV 003265" v. : JUDGE CAIN OHIO DEPARTMENT OF : EDUCATION, et al, : Defendants/ Respondents. ’ JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE INITIAL JOINT DISCLOSURE OF WITNESSES The parties move the Court tor a sixty (60) day extension of time, until September 20, 2010, to file their in…
ce asco (iC itoonangy 202 SEP 25 PH 3:49 GREGORY A. BRUSH CLERK OF COURTS MON (SOME RY CO, OHIG IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO Shelia Ann Smith. PLAINTIFF Address: 4924 Hulman Or Dayton Ohio 45406 DOB: 08-29-1964 Number of marriages: 1 -VS.- Todd lee Smith DEFENDANT Address: 3948 Nicholas Rd Dayton Ohio 45417 DOB: 06-01-1962 Number of Marriages: 1 DIVISION OF DOMESTIC RELATIONS 12DR 1032 CASE NO.. JUDGE: TIMOTHY D. WOOD COMPLAINT FOR DIVORCE Shelia Ann …
Sep 25, 2012
CLOSED
Montgomery County, OH
Sep 25, 2012
DIVORCE WITHOUT CHILDREN
Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2014 Jan 03 9:54 AM-13CV001323 OB551 - Q37 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO CIVIL DIVISION JONATHAN C. BEARD, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, : CASE No. 13CV001323 VS. : : JUDGE Fats COLUMBUS BOARD OF EDUCATION ET AL., DEFENDANTS. DEFENDANT SUPERINTENDENT RICHARD ROSS’ RESPONSE TO SUPPLEMENT FILED BY THE COLUMBUS CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT DEFENDANTS In light of the recent supplemental filing of the Columbus City School Distr…
CV-2014-08-3778 CMCO 08/15/2014 15:45:52 PM CALLAHAN, LYNNE S. Page 1 of 9 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF SUMMIT COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION ANNA EPPERSON ) Case No. __________________ 57764 Fairway Drive …
Aug 15, 2014
CV-2016-10-4208 MLEA 12/02/2016 19:06:06 PM MCKENNEY, TODD Page 1 of 6 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS SUMMIT COUNTY, OHIO PAUL DOUGALL, et al., ) Case No. CV-2016-10-4208 4832 REMMINGTON AVE. …
Oct 03, 2016
Summit County, OH
Dec 02, 2016
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.