Ohio Administrative Code|Rule 3301-102-10 | Dropout prevention and recovery academic performance rating and report card system.

                                                

(A) A dropout prevention and recovery school is one to which any of the following applies:

(1) Any community school that operates a drug recovery program in cooperation with a court; or

(2) Any community school in which the majority of students are enrolled in a dropout prevention and recovery program operated by the school that meets the following criteria:

(a) The program serves only students not younger than sixteen years of age and not older than twenty-one years of age;

(b) The program enrolls students who, at the time of their initial enrollment, either, or both, are at least one grade level behind their cohort age groups or experience crises that significantly interfere with their academic progress such that they are prevented from continuing their traditional programs;

(c) The program requires students to attain at least the applicable score designated for each of the assessments prescribed under division (B)(1) of section 3301.0710 of the Revised Code or, to the extent prescribed by rule of the state board of education under division (D)(6) of section 3301.0712 of the Revised Code, division (B)(2) of that section;

(d) The program develops an individual career plan for the student that specifies the student's matriculating to a two-year degree program, acquiring a business and industry credential, or entering an apprenticeship;

(e) The program provides counseling and support for the student related to the plan developed under division (A)(4) of that section during the remainder of the student's high school experience; and

(f) The programs instructional plan demonstrates how the academic content standards adopted by the state board of education under section 3301.079 of the Revised Code will be taught and assessed; or

(3) Any conversion community school whose sponsoring district has received a waiver from having the schools academic data rolled up into the districts local report card because the school primarily enrolls students between sixteen and twenty-two years of age who dropped out of high school or are at risk of dropping out of high school due to poor attendance, disciplinary problems, or suspensions.

(B) Pursuant to section 3314.017 of the Revised Code, the state board of education shall prescribe an academic performance rating, benchmark and report card system for community schools that primarily serve students enrolled in dropout prevention and recovery programs as described in division (A)(4)(a) of section 3314.35 of the Revised Code, to be used in lieu of the system prescribed under sections 3302.03 and 3314.012 of the Revised Code, beginning with the 2012-2013 school year. Each such school shall comply with the testing and reporting requirements of the system as prescribed by the state board.

(C) Nothing in this rule and the academic performance rating, benchmark and report card system prescribed by the state board shall relieve a school from its obligations under the "No Child Left Behind Act of 2001" to make "adequate yearly progress" as defined in section 3302.01 of the Revised Code, or a school's amenability to the provisions of section 3302.04 or 3302.041 of the Revised Code. The department shall continue to report each school's performance as required by the act and enforce applicable sanctions under section 3302.04 or 3302.041 of the Revised Code.

(D) The academic performance rating, benchmark and report card system shall use the following performance indicators:

(1) Graduation rates for the four year student graduation cohort:

(a) A performance rating for the four year student graduation cohort of thirty-six per cent or higher means that the school earns the rating of "exceeds standards" on this indicator;

(b) A performance rating of at least eight per cent and no higher than thirty-five point nine per cent means that the school earns the rating of "meets standards" on this indicator; and

(c) A rating of less than seven-point-nine per cent means that the school receives the rating of "does not meet standards" for this indicator;

(2) Graduation rates for the five, six, seven and eight year student graduation cohorts:

(a) A performance rating of forty per cent or higher means that the school earns the rating of "exceeds standards" on these graduation rates;

(b) A performance rating of at least twelve per cent and no higher than thirty-nine point nine per cent means that the school earns the rating of "meets standards" on these graduation rates; and

(c) A rating of less than twelve per cent means that the school receives the rating of "does not meet standards" for these graduation rates.

(3) Passage rate for twelfth-grade students currently enrolled in the school who have attained the designated passing score on all of the applicable state high school achievement assessments required under division (B)(1) or (B)(2) of section 3301.0710 of the Revised Code and other students enrolled in the school, regardless of grade level, who are within three months of their twenty-second birthday and have attained the designated passing score on all of the applicable state high school achievement assessments by their twenty-second birthday:

(a) A performance rating of sixty-eight per cent or higher means that the school earns a rating of "exceeds standards";

(b) A performance rating of at least thirty-two per cent and no higher than sixty-seven point nine per cent means that the school earns a rating of "meets standards"; and

(c) A performance rating of less than thirty-two per cent means that the school receives the rating of "does not meet standards";

(4) Annual measurable objectives as defined in section 3302.01 of the Revised Code;

(a) A performance rating of thirty-six per cent or higher means that the school earns a rating of "exceeds standards";

(b) A performance rating of at least one per cent and no higher than thirty-five point nine per cent means that the school earns a rating of "meets standards"; and

(c) A performance rating of less than one per cent means that the school receives the rating of "does not meet standards";

(E) It is the intention of the state board of education to periodically review performance levels for each established benchmark as prescribed in section 3314.017 of the Revised Code and amend those benchmarks, if the data analysis warrants a revision.

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 2 pages

fom aro E0181 - 75 a % % Wo, IN THE COURT OF COMMON FLEAS, <p, @,, ae, FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO y. 4 > % iw) STATE OF OHIO ex rel., : “hy BUCCIERE FINANCIAL INC., ct al., Plaintiffs /Relators, : CASE NO. 10 CV 003265" v. : JUDGE CAIN OHIO DEPARTMENT OF : EDUCATION, et al, : Defendants/ Respondents. ’ JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE INITIAL JOINT DISCLOSURE OF WITNESSES The parties move the Court tor a sixty (60) day extension of time, until September 20, 2010, to file their in…

Case Name 10 CV 003265
Case Filed

Mar 02, 2010

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Franklin County, OH

Filed Date

Jul 09, 2010

Judge Hon. KAREN PHIPPS Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for KAREN PHIPPS
preview-icon 2 pages

ce asco (iC itoonangy 202 SEP 25 PH 3:49 GREGORY A. BRUSH CLERK OF COURTS MON (SOME RY CO, OHIG IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO Shelia Ann Smith. PLAINTIFF Address: 4924 Hulman Or Dayton Ohio 45406 DOB: 08-29-1964 Number of marriages: 1 -VS.- Todd lee Smith DEFENDANT Address: 3948 Nicholas Rd Dayton Ohio 45417 DOB: 06-01-1962 Number of Marriages: 1 DIVISION OF DOMESTIC RELATIONS 12DR 1032 CASE NO.. JUDGE: TIMOTHY D. WOOD COMPLAINT FOR DIVORCE Shelia Ann …

Case Filed

Sep 25, 2012

Case Status

CLOSED

County

Montgomery County, OH

Filed Date

Sep 25, 2012

Category

DIVORCE WITHOUT CHILDREN

preview-icon 3 pages

Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2014 Jan 03 9:54 AM-13CV001323 OB551 - Q37 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO CIVIL DIVISION JONATHAN C. BEARD, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, : CASE No. 13CV001323 VS. : : JUDGE Fats COLUMBUS BOARD OF EDUCATION ET AL., DEFENDANTS. DEFENDANT SUPERINTENDENT RICHARD ROSS’ RESPONSE TO SUPPLEMENT FILED BY THE COLUMBUS CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT DEFENDANTS In light of the recent supplemental filing of the Columbus City School Distr…

County

Franklin County, OH

Filed Date

Jan 03, 2014

Judge Hon. ANDY D MILLER Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for ANDY D MILLER
preview-icon 9 pages

CV-2014-08-3778 CMCO 08/15/2014 15:45:52 PM CALLAHAN, LYNNE S. Page 1 of 9 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF SUMMIT COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION ANNA EPPERSON ) Case No. __________________ 57764 Fairway Drive …

County

Summit County, OH

Filed Date

Aug 15, 2014

Category

OTHER CIVIL

Judge Hon. KELLY MCLAUGHLIN Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for KELLY MCLAUGHLIN
preview-icon 6 pages

CV-2016-10-4208 MLEA 12/02/2016 19:06:06 PM MCKENNEY, TODD Page 1 of 6 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS SUMMIT COUNTY, OHIO PAUL DOUGALL, et al., ) Case No. CV-2016-10-4208 4832 REMMINGTON AVE. …

County

Summit County, OH

Filed Date

Dec 02, 2016

Category

ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL

Judge Hon. ALISON BREAUX Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for ALISON BREAUX
View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope