Connecticut General Statutes|Sec. 38a-591l. Independent review organizations conducting external reviews and expedited external reviews.

                                                

Sec. 38a-591l. Independent review organizations conducting external reviews and expedited external reviews. (a)(1) The commissioner shall approve independent review organizations eligible to be assigned to conduct external reviews and expedited external reviews under section 38a-591g.


(2) The commissioner shall (A) develop an application form for the initial approval and for the reapproval of independent review organizations, and (B) maintain and periodically update a list of approved independent review organizations.


(b) (1) Any independent review organization seeking to conduct external reviews and expedited external reviews under section 38a-591g shall submit the application form for approval or reapproval, as applicable, to the commissioner and shall include all documentation and information necessary for the commissioner to determine if the independent review organization satisfies the minimum qualifications established under this section.


(2) An approval or reapproval shall be effective for two years, unless the commissioner determines before the expiration of such approval or reapproval that the independent review organization no longer satisfies the minimum qualifications established under this section.


(3) Whenever the commissioner determines that an independent review organization has lost its accreditation or no longer satisfies the minimum requirements established under this section, the commissioner shall terminate the approval of the independent review organization and remove the independent review organization from the list of approved independent review organizations specified in subdivision (2) of subsection (a) of this section.


(c) To be eligible for approval by the commissioner, an independent review organization shall:


(1) Have and maintain written policies and procedures that govern all aspects of both the standard external review process and the expedited external review process set forth in section 38a-591g that include, at a minimum:


(A) A quality assurance mechanism in place that ensures:


(i) That external reviews and expedited external reviews are conducted within the specified time frames and required notices are provided in a timely manner;


(ii) (I) The selection of qualified and impartial clinical peers to conduct such reviews on behalf of the independent review organization and the suitable matching of such peers to specific cases, and (II) the employment of or the contracting with an adequate number of clinical peers to meet this objective;


(iii) The confidentiality of medical and treatment records and clinical review criteria;


(iv) That any person employed by or under contract with the independent review organization adheres to the requirements of section 38a-591g; and


(B) A toll-free telephone number to receive information twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week, related to external reviews and expedited external reviews and that is capable of accepting, recording or providing appropriate instruction to incoming telephone callers during other than normal business hours;


(2) Agree to maintain and provide to the commissioner the information set forth in section 38a-591m;


(3) Not own or control, be a subsidiary of, be owned or controlled in any way by, or exercise control with a health benefit plan, a national, state or local trade association of health benefit plans, or a national, state or local trade association of health care professionals; and


(4) Assign as a clinical peer a health care professional who meets the following minimum qualifications:


(A) Is an expert in the treatment of the covered person's medical condition that is the subject of the review;


(B) Is knowledgeable about the recommended health care service or treatment through recent or current actual clinical experience treating patients with the same or similar medical condition of the covered person;


(C) Holds a nonrestricted license in a state of the United States and, for physicians, a current certification by a recognized American medical specialty board in the area or areas appropriate to the subject of the review; and


(D) Has no history of disciplinary actions or sanctions, including loss of staff privileges or participation restrictions, that have been taken or are pending by any hospital, governmental agency or unit or regulatory body that raise a substantial question as to the clinical peer's physical, mental or professional competence or moral character.


(d) (1) An independent review organization that is accredited by a nationally recognized private accrediting entity that has independent review accreditation standards that the commissioner has determined are equivalent to or exceed the minimum qualifications of this section shall be presumed to be in compliance with this section.


(2) The commissioner shall initially review and periodically review the independent review organization accreditation standards of a nationally recognized private accrediting entity to determine whether such entity's standards are, and continue to be, equivalent to or exceed the minimum qualifications established under this section. The commissioner may accept a review conducted by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners for the purpose of the determination under this subdivision.


(3) Upon request, a nationally recognized private accrediting entity shall make its current independent review organization accreditation standards available to the commissioner or the National Association of Insurance Commissioners in order for the commissioner to determine if such entity's standards are equivalent to or exceed the minimum qualifications established under this section. The commissioner may exclude any private accrediting entity that is not reviewed by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners.


(P.A. 11-58, S. 65; P.A. 12-145, S. 25.)


History: P.A. 11-58 effective July 1, 2011; P.A. 12-145 made a technical change in Subsec. (c)(1)(A), effective June 15, 2012.

View Latest Dockets

3 Files
Filed

Apr 30, 2024

Court

Superior

County

New Haven County, CT

Practice Area

Insurance

Matter Type

General Insurance

3 Files
Filed

Mar 04, 2024

Court

Fairfield County

County

Fairfield County, CT

Practice Area

Torts

Matter Type

Automobile

10 Files
Filed

Nov 21, 2023

Court

Hartford County

County

Hartford County, CT

Practice Area

Insurance

Matter Type

General Insurance

11 Files
Filed

Aug 30, 2023

Court

New Haven County

County

New Haven County, CT

Practice Area

Insurance

Matter Type

Insurance Coverage

23 Files
Filed

Dec 06, 2021

Judge

Hon. Michael P. Kamp Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Michael P. Kamp

Court

New Haven County

County

New Haven County, CT

Practice Area

Insurance

Matter Type

General Insurance

View More Dockets

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 4 pages

AAN-CV-15-6018031-S SUPERIOR COURT CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONTA/ COMPANY MILFORD VS. AT MILFORD ELIZABETH LAPUMA, ET. AL. MAY 13, 2015 RE UEST TO REVISE Pursuant to Section 10-35 of the Connecticut Practice Boo…

County

New Haven County, CT

Filed Date

May 13, 2015

Judge Hon. Barry K. Stevens Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Barry K. Stevens
preview-icon 5 pages

DOCKET NO. HHD-CV-18-6095387-S MONTAVIOUS FINLEY ) SUPERIOR COURT ) ) ) V. ) …

County

Hartford County, CT

Filed Date

Feb 22, 2019

Judge Hon. A. Susan Peck Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for A. Susan Peck
preview-icon 4 pages

DOCKET NO.: MMX-CV19-6023735-S : SUPERIOR COURT ANN L. GILLESPIE-WHITE J.D. OF MIDDLESEX V. : AT MIDDLETOWN GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO.: OCTOBER 12, 2022 PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF EX…

County

Middlesex County, CT

Filed Date

Oct 12, 2022

Judge Hon. Rupal Shah Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Rupal Shah
preview-icon 4 pages

DOCKET NO.: MMX-CV19-6023735-S : SUPERIOR COURT ANN L. GILLESPIE-WHITE J.D. OF MIDDLESEX V. : AT MIDDLETOWN GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO.: DECMEBER 11, 2022 AMENDED PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF E…

County

Middlesex County, CT

Filed Date

Dec 12, 2022

Judge Hon. Rupal Shah Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Rupal Shah
preview-icon 3 pages

NO. HHD-CV19-6108505-S AFFORD-A-BAIL BONDS : SUPERIOR COURT VS. : J. D. OF HARTFORD CHRISTINE H. STEELE : FEBRUARY 11, 2021 DEFENDANT’S POST-TRIAL MEMORANDUM Th…

County

Hartford County, CT

Filed Date

Feb 11, 2021

Judge Hon. Matthew J. Budzik Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Matthew J. Budzik
View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope