Connecticut General Statutes|Sec. 38a-912. (Formerly Sec. 38-430). Seizure order by court.

                                                

Sec. 38a-912. (Formerly Sec. 38-430). Seizure order by court. (a) The commissioner may file in the Superior Court of this state a petition alleging, with respect to a domestic insurer: (1) That there exist any grounds that would justify a court order for a formal delinquency proceeding against an insurer under sections 38a-903 to 38a-961, inclusive; (2) that the interests of policyholders, creditors or the public will be endangered by delay; and (3) the contents of an order deemed necessary by the commissioner.


(b) Upon a filing under subsection (a) of this section, the court may issue forthwith, ex parte and without a hearing, the requested order which shall direct the commissioner to take possession and control of all or a part of the property, books, accounts, documents and other records of an insurer, and of the premises occupied by it for the transaction of its business, and until further order of the court enjoin the insurer and its officers, managers, agents and employees from disposition of its property and from the transaction of its business except with the written consent of the commissioner.


(c) The court shall specify in the order what its duration shall be, which shall be such time as the court deems necessary for the commissioner to ascertain the condition of the insurer. On motion of either party or on its own motion, the court may from time to time hold such hearings as it deems desirable after such notice as it deems appropriate, and may extend, shorten, or modify the terms of the seizure order. The court shall vacate the seizure order if the commissioner fails to commence a formal proceeding under sections 38a-903 to 38a-961, inclusive, after having had a reasonable opportunity to do so. An order of the court pursuant to a formal proceeding under said sections shall vacate the seizure order.


(d) Entry of a seizure order under this section shall not constitute an anticipatory breach of any contract of the insurer.


(e) An insurer subject to an ex parte order under this section may petition the court at any time after the issuance of such order for a hearing and review of the order. The court shall hold such a hearing and review not more than fifteen days after the request. A hearing under this subsection may be held privately in chambers and it shall be so held if the insurer proceeded against so requests.


(f) If, at any time after the issuance of such an order, it appears to the court that any person whose interest is or will be substantially affected by the order did not appear at the hearing and has not been served, the court may order that notice be given. An order that notice be given shall not stay the effect of any order previously issued by the court.


(P.A. 79-382, S. 10; P.A. 92-93, S. 8.)


History: Sec. 38-430 transferred to Sec. 38a-912 in 1991; P.A. 92-93 made technical corrections for statutory consistency.

View Latest Dockets

3 Files
Filed

Apr 30, 2024

Court

Superior

County

New Haven County, CT

Practice Area

Insurance

Matter Type

General Insurance

3 Files
Filed

Mar 04, 2024

Court

Fairfield County

County

Fairfield County, CT

Practice Area

Torts

Matter Type

Automobile

10 Files
Filed

Nov 21, 2023

Court

Hartford County

County

Hartford County, CT

Practice Area

Insurance

Matter Type

General Insurance

11 Files
Filed

Aug 30, 2023

Court

New Haven County

County

New Haven County, CT

Practice Area

Insurance

Matter Type

Insurance Coverage

23 Files
Filed

Dec 06, 2021

Judge

Hon. Michael P. Kamp Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Michael P. Kamp

Court

New Haven County

County

New Haven County, CT

Practice Area

Insurance

Matter Type

General Insurance

View More Dockets

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 4 pages

AAN-CV-15-6018031-S SUPERIOR COURT CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONTA/ COMPANY MILFORD VS. AT MILFORD ELIZABETH LAPUMA, ET. AL. MAY 13, 2015 RE UEST TO REVISE Pursuant to Section 10-35 of the Connecticut Practice Boo…

County

New Haven County, CT

Filed Date

May 13, 2015

Judge Hon. Barry K. Stevens Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Barry K. Stevens
preview-icon 5 pages

DOCKET NO. HHD-CV-18-6095387-S MONTAVIOUS FINLEY ) SUPERIOR COURT ) ) ) V. ) …

County

Hartford County, CT

Filed Date

Feb 22, 2019

Judge Hon. A. Susan Peck Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for A. Susan Peck
preview-icon 4 pages

DOCKET NO.: MMX-CV19-6023735-S : SUPERIOR COURT ANN L. GILLESPIE-WHITE J.D. OF MIDDLESEX V. : AT MIDDLETOWN GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO.: OCTOBER 12, 2022 PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF EX…

County

Middlesex County, CT

Filed Date

Oct 12, 2022

Judge Hon. Rupal Shah Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Rupal Shah
preview-icon 4 pages

DOCKET NO.: MMX-CV19-6023735-S : SUPERIOR COURT ANN L. GILLESPIE-WHITE J.D. OF MIDDLESEX V. : AT MIDDLETOWN GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO.: DECMEBER 11, 2022 AMENDED PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF E…

County

Middlesex County, CT

Filed Date

Dec 12, 2022

Judge Hon. Rupal Shah Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Rupal Shah
preview-icon 3 pages

NO. HHD-CV19-6108505-S AFFORD-A-BAIL BONDS : SUPERIOR COURT VS. : J. D. OF HARTFORD CHRISTINE H. STEELE : FEBRUARY 11, 2021 DEFENDANT’S POST-TRIAL MEMORANDUM Th…

County

Hartford County, CT

Filed Date

Feb 11, 2021

Judge Hon. Matthew J. Budzik Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Matthew J. Budzik
View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope