Connecticut General Statutes|Sec. 38a-477cc. Contracts for pharmacy services with health carriers or pharmacy benefits managers.

                                                

Sec. 38a-477cc. Contracts for pharmacy services with health carriers or pharmacy benefits managers. (a) No contract for pharmacy services entered into in the state between a health carrier, as defined in section 38a-591a, or pharmacy benefits manager, as defined in section 38a-479aaa, and a pharmacy or pharmacist shall:


(1) On and after January 1, 2018, contain a provision prohibiting or penalizing, including through increased utilization review, reduced payments or other financial disincentives, a pharmacist's disclosure to an individual purchasing prescription medication of information regarding:


(A) The cost of the prescription medication to the individual; or


(B) The availability of any therapeutically equivalent alternative medications or alternative methods of purchasing the prescription medication, including, but not limited to, paying a cash price, that are less expensive than the cost of the prescription medication to the individual; and


(2) On and after January 1, 2020, contain a provision permitting the health carrier or pharmacy benefits manager to recoup, directly or indirectly, from a pharmacy or pharmacist any portion of a claim that such health carrier or pharmacy benefits manager has paid to the pharmacy or pharmacist, unless such recoupment is permitted under section 38a-479iii or required by applicable law.


(b) (1) On and after January 1, 2018, no health carrier or pharmacy benefits manager shall require an individual to make a payment at the point of sale for a covered prescription medication in an amount greater than the lesser of:


(A) The applicable copayment for such prescription medication;


(B) The allowable claim amount for the prescription medication; or


(C) The amount an individual would pay for the prescription medication if the individual purchased the prescription medication without using a health benefit plan, as defined in section 38a-591a, or any other source of prescription medication benefits or discounts.


(2) For the purposes of this subsection, “allowable claim amount” means the amount the health carrier or pharmacy benefits manager has agreed to pay the pharmacy for the prescription medication.


(c) Any provision of a contract that violates the provisions of this section shall be void and unenforceable. Any general business practice that violates the provisions of this section shall constitute an unfair trade practice pursuant to chapter 735a. The invalidity or unenforceability of any contract provision under this subsection shall not affect any other provision of the contract.


(d) The Insurance Commissioner may:


(1) Enforce the provisions of this section pursuant to chapter 697; and


(2) Upon request, audit a contract for pharmacy services for compliance with the provisions of this section.


(P.A. 17-241, S. 1; P.A. 19-199, S. 1.)


History: P.A. 19-199 amended Subsec. (a) by deleting reference to January 1, 2018, designating existing provisions re contract for pharmacy services as new Subdiv. (1) and amending same by adding reference to January 1, 2018, redesignating existing Subdiv. (1) as Subpara. (A) and redesignating existing Subdiv. (2) as Subpara. (B), and adding new Subdiv. (2) re contract for pharmacy services on and after January 1, 2020, amended Subsec. (b) by designating existing provisions re payment at point of sale for prescription medication as new Subdiv. (1), redesignating existing Subdiv. (1) as Subpara. (A), redesignating existing Subdivs. (2) and (3) as Subparas. (B) and (C), and designating existing provision defining “allowable claim amount” as Subdiv. (2), and made technical and conforming changes.

View Latest Dockets

3 Files
Filed

Apr 30, 2024

Court

Superior

County

New Haven County, CT

Practice Area

Insurance

Matter Type

General Insurance

3 Files
Filed

Mar 04, 2024

Court

Fairfield County

County

Fairfield County, CT

Practice Area

Torts

Matter Type

Automobile

10 Files
Filed

Nov 21, 2023

Court

Hartford County

County

Hartford County, CT

Practice Area

Insurance

Matter Type

General Insurance

11 Files
Filed

Aug 30, 2023

Court

New Haven County

County

New Haven County, CT

Practice Area

Insurance

Matter Type

Insurance Coverage

23 Files
Filed

Dec 06, 2021

Judge

Hon. Michael P. Kamp Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Michael P. Kamp

Court

New Haven County

County

New Haven County, CT

Practice Area

Insurance

Matter Type

General Insurance

View More Dockets

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 4 pages

AAN-CV-15-6018031-S SUPERIOR COURT CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONTA/ COMPANY MILFORD VS. AT MILFORD ELIZABETH LAPUMA, ET. AL. MAY 13, 2015 RE UEST TO REVISE Pursuant to Section 10-35 of the Connecticut Practice Boo…

County

New Haven County, CT

Filed Date

May 13, 2015

Judge Hon. Barry K. Stevens Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Barry K. Stevens
preview-icon 5 pages

DOCKET NO. HHD-CV-18-6095387-S MONTAVIOUS FINLEY ) SUPERIOR COURT ) ) ) V. ) …

County

Hartford County, CT

Filed Date

Feb 22, 2019

Judge Hon. A. Susan Peck Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for A. Susan Peck
preview-icon 4 pages

DOCKET NO.: MMX-CV19-6023735-S : SUPERIOR COURT ANN L. GILLESPIE-WHITE J.D. OF MIDDLESEX V. : AT MIDDLETOWN GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO.: OCTOBER 12, 2022 PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF EX…

County

Middlesex County, CT

Filed Date

Oct 12, 2022

Judge Hon. Rupal Shah Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Rupal Shah
preview-icon 4 pages

DOCKET NO.: MMX-CV19-6023735-S : SUPERIOR COURT ANN L. GILLESPIE-WHITE J.D. OF MIDDLESEX V. : AT MIDDLETOWN GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO.: DECMEBER 11, 2022 AMENDED PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF E…

County

Middlesex County, CT

Filed Date

Dec 12, 2022

Judge Hon. Rupal Shah Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Rupal Shah
preview-icon 3 pages

NO. HHD-CV19-6108505-S AFFORD-A-BAIL BONDS : SUPERIOR COURT VS. : J. D. OF HARTFORD CHRISTINE H. STEELE : FEBRUARY 11, 2021 DEFENDANT’S POST-TRIAL MEMORANDUM Th…

County

Hartford County, CT

Filed Date

Feb 11, 2021

Judge Hon. Matthew J. Budzik Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Matthew J. Budzik
View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope