Connecticut General Statutes|Sec. 38a-940. (Formerly Sec. 38-458). Special provisions for third party claims. Liquidator recommendations. Provisions not applicable to claims covered by guaranty association.

                                                

Sec. 38a-940. (Formerly Sec. 38-458). Special provisions for third party claims. Liquidator recommendations. Provisions not applicable to claims covered by guaranty association. (a) Whenever any third party asserts a cause of action against an insured of an insurer in liquidation, the third party may file a claim with the liquidator on or before the last day for filing claims.


(b) Whether or not the third party files a claim, the insured may file a claim on the insured's own behalf in the liquidation. To the extent the insured files a claim, it shall be deemed sufficient to cover all related third party claims. If the insured fails to file a claim by the date for filing claims specified in the order of liquidation or within sixty days after mailing of the notice required by section 38a-924, whichever is later, the insured shall be deemed an unexcused late filer.


(c) The liquidator shall make recommendations to the court pursuant to section 38a-944 for the allowance of an insured's claim pursuant to subsection (b) of this section after consideration of the probable outcome of any pending action against the insured on which the claim is based, the probable damages recoverable in the action and the probable costs and expenses of defense. After allowance by the court, the liquidator shall withhold any dividends payable on the claim, pending the outcome of litigation and negotiation with the insured. Whenever it seems appropriate, the liquidator shall reconsider the claim on the basis of additional information and amend his recommendations to the court. The insured shall be afforded the same notice and opportunity to be heard on all changes in the recommendation as in its initial determination. The court may amend its allowance as it finds appropriate. As claims against the insured are settled or barred, the insured shall be paid from the amount withheld the same percentage dividend as was paid on other claims of like priority, based on the lesser of (1) the amount actually recovered from the insured by action or paid by agreement plus the reasonable costs and expenses of defense, or (2) the amount allowed on the claims by the court. After all claims are settled or barred, any sum remaining from the amount withheld shall revert to the undistributed assets of the insurer. Delay in final payment under this subsection shall not be a reason for unreasonable delay of final distribution and discharge of the liquidator.


(d) If several claims founded upon one policy are filed, whether by third parties or as claims by the insured under this section, and the aggregate allowed amount of the claims to which the same limit of liability in the policy is applicable exceeds that limit, each claim as allowed shall be reduced in the same proportion so that the total equals the policy limit. Claims by the insured shall be evaluated as in subsection (c) of this section. If any insured's claim is subsequently reduced under subsection (c) of this section, the amount thus freed shall be apportioned ratably among the claims which have been reduced under this subsection.


(e) No claim may be presented under this section if it is or may be covered by any guaranty association.


(P.A. 79-382, S. 38; P.A. 98-214, S. 19; P.A. 15-118, S. 58.)


History: Sec. 38-458 transferred to Sec. 38a-940 in 1991; P.A. 98-214 amended Subsec. (a) to add “on or before the last day for filing claims”, amended Subsec. (b) re sufficiency of claim filed by insured re all related third party claims and to make technical changes, amended Subsec. (c) to delete “his” re liquidator's recommendations and to substitute “the liquidator” for “he” and “finds” for “thinks”, and amended Subsec. (e) to delete “or foreign guaranty association”; P.A. 15-118 made a technical change in Subsec. (b).

View Latest Dockets

3 Files
Filed

Apr 30, 2024

Court

Superior

County

New Haven County, CT

Practice Area

Insurance

Matter Type

General Insurance

3 Files
Filed

Mar 04, 2024

Court

Fairfield County

County

Fairfield County, CT

Practice Area

Torts

Matter Type

Automobile

10 Files
Filed

Nov 21, 2023

Court

Hartford County

County

Hartford County, CT

Practice Area

Insurance

Matter Type

General Insurance

11 Files
Filed

Aug 30, 2023

Court

New Haven County

County

New Haven County, CT

Practice Area

Insurance

Matter Type

Insurance Coverage

10 Files
Filed

Jan 29, 2024

Judge

Hon. Robert E. Young Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Robert E. Young

Court

Superior

County

Hartford County, CT

Practice Area

Insurance

Matter Type

Insurance Coverage

View More Dockets

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 4 pages

AAN-CV-15-6018031-S SUPERIOR COURT CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONTA/ COMPANY MILFORD VS. AT MILFORD ELIZABETH LAPUMA, ET. AL. MAY 13, 2015 RE UEST TO REVISE Pursuant to Section 10-35 of the Connecticut Practice Boo…

County

New Haven County, CT

Filed Date

May 13, 2015

Judge Hon. Barry K. Stevens Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Barry K. Stevens
preview-icon 5 pages

DOCKET NO. HHD-CV-18-6095387-S MONTAVIOUS FINLEY ) SUPERIOR COURT ) ) ) V. ) …

County

Hartford County, CT

Filed Date

Feb 22, 2019

Judge Hon. A. Susan Peck Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for A. Susan Peck
preview-icon 4 pages

DOCKET NO.: MMX-CV19-6023735-S : SUPERIOR COURT ANN L. GILLESPIE-WHITE J.D. OF MIDDLESEX V. : AT MIDDLETOWN GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO.: OCTOBER 12, 2022 PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF EX…

County

Middlesex County, CT

Filed Date

Oct 12, 2022

Judge Hon. Rupal Shah Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Rupal Shah
preview-icon 4 pages

DOCKET NO.: MMX-CV19-6023735-S : SUPERIOR COURT ANN L. GILLESPIE-WHITE J.D. OF MIDDLESEX V. : AT MIDDLETOWN GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO.: DECMEBER 11, 2022 AMENDED PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF E…

County

Middlesex County, CT

Filed Date

Dec 12, 2022

Judge Hon. Rupal Shah Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Rupal Shah
preview-icon 3 pages

NO. HHD-CV19-6108505-S AFFORD-A-BAIL BONDS : SUPERIOR COURT VS. : J. D. OF HARTFORD CHRISTINE H. STEELE : FEBRUARY 11, 2021 DEFENDANT’S POST-TRIAL MEMORANDUM Th…

County

Hartford County, CT

Filed Date

Feb 11, 2021

Judge Hon. Matthew J. Budzik Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Matthew J. Budzik
View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope