California Laws|Section 14006.2.

                                                

14006.2.  

(a) In determining the eligibility of a married individual, pursuant to Section 14005.4 or 14005.7, who, in accordance with Title XIX of the federal Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. Sec. 1396 et seq.) and regulations adopted pursuant thereto, is considered to be living separately from their spouse, the individual shall be considered to have made a transfer of resources for full and adequate consideration under Section 14006 or 14015 by reason of either of the following:

(1) Having entered into a written agreement with
their spouse dividing their nonexempt community property into equal shares of separate property. Property so agreed to be separate property shall be considered by the department to be the separate property of the spouse who, pursuant to the agreement, is the owner of the property. Only in cases in which separate property owned by one spouse is actually made available to the other spouse, may the department count the separate property in the eligibility determination of the nonowner spouse.

(2) Having transferred to their spouse all of
their interest in a home, whether the transfer was made before or after the individual became a resident in a nursing facility in accordance with and to the extent permitted by Title XIX of the federal Social Security Act and regulations promulgated pursuant thereto.

(b) The department shall furnish to all Medi-Cal applicants a clear and simple statement in writing advising them that (1) in the case of an individual who is an inpatient in a nursing facility, if the individual or the individual’s conservator transferred to the individual’s spouse all of the interest in a home, the individual shall not be considered ineligible for Medi-Cal by reason of the transfer; and that (2) if the individual and the individual’s spouse execute a written interspousal agreement
that divides and transmutes nonexempt community property into equal shares of separate property, the separate property of the individual’s spouse shall not be considered available to the individual and need not be spent by the spouse for the individual’s care in a nursing facility or other medical institution. The statement provided for in this subdivision shall also be furnished to each individual admitted to a nursing facility, along with, but separately from, the statement required under Section 72527 of Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations.

(c) In order to qualify for Medi-Cal benefits pursuant to Section 14005.4 or 14005.7, a married individual who resides in a nursing facility, and who is in a Medi-Cal budget unit separate from that of
their spouse, shall be required to expend
their other resources for their own benefit, so that the amount that remains does not exceed the limit established pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 14006. In the event that the married individual expends their resources for expenses associated with or for improvements to property, those expenditures shall be considered to be for
their own benefit only to the extent that the expenditures are proportionate to the ownership interest the individual has in the property. For purposes of this section, the term “their other resources” shall be limited to the following:

(1) All of their separate property that would not have been exempt under applicable Medi-Cal laws and regulations at the time when
they
entered a nursing facility, or at the date of execution of the agreement referred to in this section, whichever is earlier. For purposes of this paragraph, the mere change of residence from one facility to another shall not be deemed to be a new entry.

(2) One-half of all the community property, or the proceeds from the sale or exchange of that property, that would not have been exempt at the time described in paragraph (1).

(d) For purposes of subdivision (c), in the absence of an agreement such as that referred to in subdivision (a), there shall be a presumption, rebuttable by either spouse, that all property owned by either spouse was community property.

(e) The statement furnished pursuant to subdivision (b) shall advise all persons entering a long-term care facility, and all Medi-Cal applicants
that only their half of the community property shall be taken into account in determining their eligibility for Medi-Cal, whether or not they execute the written interspousal agreement referred to in the statement.

(f) This section shall not apply to an institutionalized spouse.

(g) This section shall apply to the full extent to an institutionalized spouse if Title XIX of the federal Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. Sec. 1396 et seq.) is amended to authorize the consideration of state community property law in determining eligibility under this chapter, or the federal government authorizes the state to apply community property laws in making that determination.

(h) (1) Subdivision (f) shall become inoperative if the federal government amends Title XIX of the federal Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
Sec. 1396 et seq.) to allow state community property laws to be considered for Medi-Cal eligibility purposes, or the federal government authorizes the state to apply community property laws in making that determination.

(2) The department shall report to the appropriate committees of the Legislature upon the occurrence of the amendment of federal law or receipt of federal authorization as specified in paragraph (1).

(i) This section shall become inoperative on the later of either January 1, 2024, or the date on which the determination of the Director of Health Care Services is communicated in writing to the Department of Finance pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 14005.62, and subject to implementation of Section 14005.62 pursuant to subdivision (d) of that
section, and shall remain inoperative for time periods in which the department has obtained the necessary federal approvals to implement paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 14005.62 for the applicable population.

(Amended by Stats. 2023, Ch. 42, Sec. 91. (AB 118) Effective July 10, 2023. Conditionally inoperative on or after January 1, 2024, by its own provisions.)
Previous Section

Doc thumbnail Section 14006.15.

Next Section

Doc thumbnail Section 14006.3.

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 2 pages

V (writvegzyén'lNi/A—flu; 1 , V Ronald W. Ask, Esq. (SBN: 103895) …

Case Filed

Apr 28, 2021

Case Status

Active

County

San Bernardino County, CA

Filed Date

Apr 28, 2021

Category

Other Probate with at Least One Hearing

preview-icon 5 pages

- % : MC-030 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): ee Kari Ellen Harris = Dpecrn | 6424 Parkcrest Way …

Case Filed

Jun 30, 2023

County

Sacramento County, CA

Filed Date

Sep 01, 2023

Category

Probate

Judge Hon. John P. Winn Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for John P. Winn
preview-icon 17 pages

MM SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Dec-20-2011 3:12 pm Case Number: CUD-11-639510 Filing Date: Dec-20-2011 3:12 Juke Box: 001 Image: 03427367 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE MARTHA CASSELMAN VS. TUYEN TRUONG et al 001003427367 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.ATTORNEYS AT LAW 870 MARKET STREET, SUITE $00, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 STEVEN ADAIR MACDONALD & ASSOCIATES, P.C TELEPHONE: (415) 956-6488 STEV…

County

San Francisco County, CA

Filed Date

Dec 20, 2011

Category

UNLAWFUL DETAINER - RESIDENTIAL

preview-icon 31 pages

BERMAN & BERMAN RONALD BERMAN, Bar No. 079775 BERMAN & BERMAN, APLC 16633 Ventura Blvd., Suite 940 ELECTRONICALLY Encino, CA 91436 FILED Voice (818) 593-5050, FAX (818) 887-5455 Pcoaaaner san eeancesst 11/15/2017 Attorney for ULYSSES G. WILLIAMS Clerk of the Court and EUNICO JOHN WILLIAM Stee SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO In Re the Estate of the CASE NO: PES-16-299402 DECLARATION OF RONALD BERMAN IN SUPPORT OF BRUCE R. BERNSTEIN’S OSCAR WILLIAMS, JR. P…

Case Filed

Jan 04, 2016

County

San Francisco County, CA

Filed Date

Nov 15, 2017

Category

PETITION FOR LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION

preview-icon 16 pages

Electronically Filed Randall W. Rosa 12/1/2020 2:04 PM Rosa Law Offices, P.C. Superior Court of California County of Stanislaus P.O. Box 1223 Clerk of the Court Lodi, CA 95241-1223 By: Guadalupe Reynoso, Deputy 209.333.8061 …

Case Filed

Dec 01, 2020

Case Status

Closed

County

Stanislaus County, CA

Filed Date

Dec 01, 2020

Judge Hon. Speiller, Stacy Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Speiller, Stacy
View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope