California Laws|Section 11349.1.

                                                

11349.1.  

(a) The office shall review all regulations adopted, amended, or repealed pursuant to the procedure specified in Article 5 (commencing with Section 11346) and submitted to it for publication in the California Code of Regulations Supplement and for transmittal to the Secretary of State and make determinations using all of the following standards:

(1) Necessity.

(2) Authority.

(3) Clarity.

(4) Consistency.

(5) Reference.

(6) Nonduplication.

In reviewing regulations pursuant to this section, the office shall restrict its review to the regulation and the record of the rulemaking proceeding. The office shall approve the regulation or order of repeal if it complies with the standards set forth in this section and with this chapter.

(b) In reviewing proposed regulations for the criteria in subdivision (a), the office may consider the clarity of the proposed regulation in the context of related regulations already in existence.

(c) The office shall adopt regulations governing the procedures it uses in reviewing regulations submitted to it. The regulations shall provide for an orderly review and shall specify the methods, standards, presumptions, and principles the office uses, and the limitations it
observes, in reviewing regulations to establish compliance with the standards specified in subdivision (a). The regulations adopted by the office shall ensure that it does not substitute its judgment for that of the rulemaking agency as expressed in the substantive content of adopted regulations.

(d) The office shall return any regulation subject to this chapter to the adopting agency if any of the following occur:

(1) The adopting agency has not prepared the estimate required by paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of Section 11346.5 and has not included the data used and calculations made and the summary report of the estimate in the file of the rulemaking.

(2) The agency has not complied with Section 11346.3. “Noncompliance” means that the agency failed to complete the economic impact assessment or standardized
regulatory impact analysis required by Section 11346.3 or failed to include the assessment or analysis in the file of the rulemaking proceeding as required by Section 11347.3.

(3) The adopting agency has prepared the estimate required by paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of Section 11346.5, the estimate indicates that the regulation will result in a cost to local agencies or school districts that is required to be reimbursed under Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4, and the adopting agency fails to do any of the following:

(A) Cite an item in the Budget Act for the fiscal year in which the regulation will go into effect as the source from which the Controller may pay the claims of local agencies or school districts.

(B) Cite an accompanying bill appropriating funds as the source from which the
Controller may pay the claims of local agencies or school districts.

(C) Attach a letter or other documentation from the Department of Finance which states that the Department of Finance has approved a request by the agency that funds be included in the Budget Bill for the next following fiscal year to reimburse local agencies or school districts for the costs mandated by the regulation.

(D) Attach a letter or other documentation from the Department of Finance which states that the Department of Finance has authorized the augmentation of the amount available for expenditure under the agency’s appropriation in the Budget Act which is for reimbursement pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 to local agencies or school districts from the unencumbered balances of other appropriations in the Budget Act and that this augmentation is sufficient to reimburse
local agencies or school districts for their costs mandated by the regulation.

(4) The proposed regulation conflicts with an existing state regulation and the agency has not identified the manner in which the conflict may be resolved.

(5) The agency did not make the alternatives determination as required by paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 11346.9.

(e) The office shall notify the Department of Finance of all regulations returned pursuant to subdivision (d).

(f) The office shall return a rulemaking file to the submitting agency if the file does not comply with subdivisions (a) and (b) of Section 11347.3. Within three state working days of the receipt of a rulemaking file, the office shall notify the submitting agency of any deficiency
identified. If no notice of deficiency is mailed to the adopting agency within that time, a rulemaking file shall be deemed submitted as of the date of its original receipt by the office. A rulemaking file shall not be deemed submitted until each deficiency identified under this subdivision has been corrected.

(g) Notwithstanding any other law, return of the regulation to the adopting agency by the office pursuant to this section is the exclusive remedy for a failure to comply with subdivision (c) of Section 11346.3 or paragraph (10) of subdivision (a) of Section 11346.5.

(Amended by Stats. 2011, Ch. 496, Sec. 9. (SB 617) Effective January 1, 2012.)

View Latest Rulings

Pursuant to Section 11349.1, the OAL reviewed the Lab Regulations for clarity, among other things, and approved them. The Coalition asks the court to apply its own review of the Lab Regulations’ clarity. (Compare Sims v.

  • Name

    COALITION OF ACCREDITED LABORATORIES VS. STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD

  • Case No.

    2020-80003543

  • Hearing

    Aug 20, 2021

View More Rulings
Previous Section

Doc thumbnail Section 11349.

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 8 pages

1 XAVIER BECERRA Attomey General of Califomia 2 ERIC M . KATZ FILED/ENDORSED Supervising Deputy Attomey General 3 L. ELIZABETH SARINE, State Bar No. 285631 JOHN S. SASAKI, State Bar No. 202161 JAN 2 2 2021 4 Deputy Attomeys General 300 South Spring Shreet, Suite 1702 By: L Romo 5 Los Angeles, CA 90013 Deputy Clerk Telephone: …

County

Sacramento County, CA

Filed Date

Jan 22, 2021

Category

Unlimited Civil

Judge Hon. Stephen P. Acquisto Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Stephen P. Acquisto
preview-icon 23 pages

WANGER JONES HELSLEY PC 265 E. River Park Circle, Suite 310 E-FILED Fresno, California 93720 6/26/2020 3:48 PM Telephone: (559) 233-4800 Superior Court of California Facsimile: (559) 233-9330 County of Fresno By: A. Ramo…

County

Fresno County, CA

Filed Date

Jun 26, 2020

Judge Hon. Gaab, Kimberly Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Gaab, Kimberly
preview-icon 8 pages

1 XAVIER BECERRA Attomey General of Califomia 2 ERIC M . KATZ FILED/ENDORSED Supervising Deputy Attomey General 3 L. ELIZABETH SARINE, State Bar No. 285631 JOHN S. SASAKI, State Bar No. 202161 JAN 2 2 2021 4 Deputy Attomeys General 300 South Spring Shreet, Suite 1702 By: L Romo 5 Los Angeles, CA 90013 Deputy Clerk Telephone: …

County

Sacramento County, CA

Filed Date

Jan 22, 2021

Category

Writ of Mandate

Judge Hon. Stephen P. Acquisto Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Stephen P. Acquisto
preview-icon 18 pages

1 TIMOTHY K. TALBOT, ESQ. (SBN 173456) JACOB A. KALINSKI, ESQ. (SBN 233709) 2 BRIAN P. ROSS, ESQ. (SBN 273991) RAINS LUCIA STERN ST. PHALLE & SILVER, PC 3 16130 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 600 Encino, California 91436 4 Telephone: (747) 221-7100 Facsimile: (747) 221-7101 5 E-mail: jkalinski@rlslawyers.com bross@rlslawyers.com 6 DAVID E. MASTAGNI, ESQ. (SBN 204244) 7 TAYLOR DAVIES-MAHAFFEY, ESQ. (SBN 327673) MASTAGNI HOLSTEDT 8 A Prof…

County

Sacramento County, CA

Filed Date

Jan 16, 2024

Category

Unlimited Civil

preview-icon 34 pages

ROB BONTA Attorney General of California FILED/ENDORSED ERIC M. KATZ Supervising Deputy Attorney General JOHN S. SASAKI AUG 04 2023 Deputy Attorney General State Bar No. 202161 By:___ Trower 300 South Spring Street, Suite 1702 Deputy Clerk Los Angeles, CA 90…

County

Sacramento County, CA

Filed Date

Aug 04, 2023

Category

Unlimited Civil

Judge Hon. Stephen P. Acquisto Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Stephen P. Acquisto
View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope