California Laws|Section 405.23.

                                                

405.23.  

Any notice of pendency of action shall be void and invalid as to any adverse party or owner of record unless the requirements of Section 405.22 are met for that party or owner and a proof of service in the form and content specified in Section 1013a has been recorded with the notice of pendency of action.

(Added by Stats. 1992, Ch. 883, Sec. 2. Effective January 1, 1993.)

View Latest Rulings

Turning to the merits, a party contending that a lis pendens is "void and invalid" for purposes of Code of Civil Procedure section 405.23 due to defective service may raise this ground in a motion for expungement. J & A Mash & Barrel, LLC v. Superior Court (2022) 74 Cal.App.5th 1, 24-25.

  • Name

    LOWE VS DIAS

  • Case No.

    37-2023-00035130-CU-OR-CTL

  • Hearing

    Jan 12, 2024

  • County

    San Diego County, CA

A party may do so on the basis that the lis pendens is void and invalid under section 405.23. ( J & A Mash & Barrel, LLC v. Superior Court of Fresno County (2022) 74 Cal.App.5th 1, 16.) A motion for expungement establishes a lis pendens is void and invalid for purposes of section 405.23 by showing service of the lis pendens did not comply with the requirements of section 405.22.

  • Name

    SOCA, LLC, AN ILLINOIS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS XCLUSIVE MANAGEMENT DETAILING INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.

  • Case No.

    23STCV24605

  • Hearing

    Feb 27, 2024

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

405.23.

  • Name

    TED JACOBSON V. ESPERANZA HANSEN

  • Case No.

    17CVP-0145

  • Hearing

    Aug 25, 2020

Therefore, pursuant to section 405.23, the notice of pending action was void. As such, it was not a privileged communication as defined in Civil Code section 47, subdivision (b)(4), because it did not impart any information or notice of a pending action as a matter of law—being void, it is considered in the eyes of the law as “comparable to a blank piece of paper.” (City of Los Angels v. Mayan (1951) 105 Cal.App.2d 726, 733.)

  • Name

    BURDO -V- EJIKE ET AL PRINT

  • Case No.

    CIVSB2223267

  • Hearing

    May 04, 2023

  • County

    San Bernardino County, CA

The motion (in Rey Sanchez) . . . relie[s] on [CCP] section 405.23, which reads in full: ‘Any notice of pendency of action shall be void and invalid as to any adverse party or owner of record unless the requirements of Section 405.22 are met for that party or owner and a proof of service in the form and content specified in Section 1013a has been recorded with the notice of pendency of action.’

  • Name

    KANTER VS DESERT VIEW FINANCIAL, LLC

  • Case No.

    CVRI2103672

  • Hearing

    Sep 04, 2022

  • County

    Riverside County, CA

View More Rulings
Previous Section

Doc thumbnail Section 405.22.

Next Section

Doc thumbnail Section 405.24.

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 5 pages

1 Nicholas A. Rogers, California Bar No. 248900 Aaron A Hayes, California Bar No. 236122 2 O’TOOLE ROGERS, LLP 3650 Mt. Diablo Blvd, Suite 180 ELECTRONICALLY 3 Lafayette, CA 94549 Telephone: 925.284.4693 …

County

San Francisco County, CA

Filed Date

Feb 22, 2022

Category

QUIET TITLE - REAL PROPERTY

Judge Hon. Samuel K. Feng Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Samuel K. Feng
preview-icon Preview

Monica Graham, Esq. (SBN 332241) GRAHAM LAW FIRM ELECTRONICALLY FILED 3857 Birch St PMB 3097 SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA COUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO NeWPort BeaCha CA 92660 …

Case Filed

Jan 12, 2024

Case Status

Active

County

San Bernardino County, CA

Filed Date

May 22, 2024

Category

Other Real Property Unlimited

Judge Hon. Michael A Sachs Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Michael A Sachs
preview-icon 4 pages

Superior Court of California, Contra Costa County Department 18 K. Bieker 925-608-1000 Court Executive Officer www.cc-courts.org MINUTE ORDER UNIVERSE PAINTING, INC. VS. LYNN BRYANT C23-00029 …

Case Filed

Jan 05, 2023

Case Status

Active

County

Contra Costa County, CA

Filed Date

Dec 08, 2023

preview-icon 4 pages

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF PLACER Date: February 13, 2024 Time: 8:25 AM Judge: Trisha Hirashima Dept.: Department 42 Reporter: Clerk: Wendorf, Suzanne vs. Ayala, Leopoldo G., et al (Present …

Case Filed

Nov 20, 2019

Case Status

Open

County

Placer County, CA

Filed Date

Feb 09, 2024

Category

Contract: Breach Cont/Warranty (06)

preview-icon Preview

CHARISSE L. SMITH, Bar No. 213646 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA charisse.smith@bbklaw.com COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO: SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP 2855 E. Guasti Road, Suite 400 MAR 6 8 2024 Ontario, California 91761 T…

Case Filed

Apr 03, 2023

Case Status

Active

County

San Bernardino County, CA

Filed Date

Mar 08, 2024

Category

Other Real Property Unlimited

Judge Hon. Joseph T Ortiz Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Joseph T Ortiz
View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope