Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and will be able to access it on trellis. You can always see your envelopes by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner.
Your subscription has successfully been upgraded.
405.23.
Any notice of pendency of action shall be void and invalid as to any adverse party or owner of record unless the requirements of Section 405.22 are met for that party or owner and a proof of service in the form and content specified in Section 1013a has been recorded with the notice of pendency of action.
Turning to the merits, a party contending that a lis pendens is "void and invalid" for purposes of Code of Civil Procedure section 405.23 due to defective service may raise this ground in a motion for expungement. J & A Mash & Barrel, LLC v. Superior Court (2022) 74 Cal.App.5th 1, 24-25.
LOWE VS DIAS
37-2023-00035130-CU-OR-CTL
Jan 12, 2024
San Diego County, CA
A party may do so on the basis that the lis pendens is void and invalid under section 405.23. ( J & A Mash & Barrel, LLC v. Superior Court of Fresno County (2022) 74 Cal.App.5th 1, 16.) A motion for expungement establishes a lis pendens is void and invalid for purposes of section 405.23 by showing service of the lis pendens did not comply with the requirements of section 405.22.
SOCA, LLC, AN ILLINOIS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS XCLUSIVE MANAGEMENT DETAILING INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.
23STCV24605
Feb 27, 2024
Los Angeles County, CA
405.23.
TED JACOBSON V. ESPERANZA HANSEN
17CVP-0145
Aug 25, 2020
San Luis Obispo County, CA
Therefore, pursuant to section 405.23, the notice of pending action was void. As such, it was not a privileged communication as defined in Civil Code section 47, subdivision (b)(4), because it did not impart any information or notice of a pending action as a matter of law—being void, it is considered in the eyes of the law as “comparable to a blank piece of paper.” (City of Los Angels v. Mayan (1951) 105 Cal.App.2d 726, 733.)
BURDO -V- EJIKE ET AL PRINT
CIVSB2223267
May 04, 2023
San Bernardino County, CA
The motion (in Rey Sanchez) . . . relie[s] on [CCP] section 405.23, which reads in full: ‘Any notice of pendency of action shall be void and invalid as to any adverse party or owner of record unless the requirements of Section 405.22 are met for that party or owner and a proof of service in the form and content specified in Section 1013a has been recorded with the notice of pendency of action.’
KANTER VS DESERT VIEW FINANCIAL, LLC
CVRI2103672
Sep 04, 2022
Riverside County, CA
1 Nicholas A. Rogers, California Bar No. 248900 Aaron A Hayes, California Bar No. 236122 2 O’TOOLE ROGERS, LLP 3650 Mt. Diablo Blvd, Suite 180 ELECTRONICALLY 3 Lafayette, CA 94549 Telephone: 925.284.4693 …
Jun 11, 2021
San Francisco County, CA
Feb 22, 2022
QUIET TITLE - REAL PROPERTY
Monica Graham, Esq. (SBN 332241) GRAHAM LAW FIRM ELECTRONICALLY FILED 3857 Birch St PMB 3097 SUPERIOR COURT 0F CALIFORNIA COUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO NeWPort BeaCha CA 92660 …
Jan 12, 2024
Active
San Bernardino County, CA
May 22, 2024
Other Real Property Unlimited
Superior Court of California, Contra Costa County Department 18 K. Bieker 925-608-1000 Court Executive Officer www.cc-courts.org MINUTE ORDER UNIVERSE PAINTING, INC. VS. LYNN BRYANT C23-00029 …
Jan 05, 2023
Active
Contra Costa County, CA
Dec 08, 2023
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF PLACER Date: February 13, 2024 Time: 8:25 AM Judge: Trisha Hirashima Dept.: Department 42 Reporter: Clerk: Wendorf, Suzanne vs. Ayala, Leopoldo G., et al (Present …
Placer County, CA
Feb 09, 2024
Contract: Breach Cont/Warranty (06)
CHARISSE L. SMITH, Bar No. 213646 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA charisse.smith@bbklaw.com COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO: SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP 2855 E. Guasti Road, Suite 400 MAR 6 8 2024 Ontario, California 91761 T…
Apr 03, 2023
Active
San Bernardino County, CA
Mar 08, 2024
Other Real Property Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.