California Laws|Section 516.030.

                                                

516.030.  

The facts stated in each affidavit filed pursuant to this chapter shall be set forth with particularity. Except where matters are specifically permitted by this chapter to be shown by information and belief, each affidavit shall show affirmatively that the affiant, if sworn as a witness, can testify competently to the facts stated therein. The affiant may be any person, whether or not a party to the action, who has knowledge of the facts. A verified complaint that satisfies the requirements of this section may be used in lieu of or in addition to an ordinary affidavit.

(Added by Stats. 1973, Ch. 526.)

View Latest Rulings

Code of Civil Procedure section 516.030, provides, ““The facts stated in each affidavit filed pursuant to this chapter shall be set forth with particularity. Except where matters are specifically permitted by this chapter to be shown by information and belief, each affidavit shall show affirmatively that the affiant, if sworn as a witness, can testify competently to the facts stated therein. The affiant may be any person, whether or not a party to the action, who has knowledge of the facts.

  • Name

    MARINE ONE ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION V. LEON

  • Case No.

    30-2016-00865578

  • Hearing

    Aug 25, 2020

Code of Civil Procedure section 516.030 provides that affidavits in support of writs of possession must set forth “[t]he facts stated” “with particularity.” “Except where matters are specifically permitted by this chapter to be shown by information and belief, each affidavit shall show affirmatively that the affiant, if sworn as a witness, can testify competently to the facts stated therein.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 516.030.)

  • Name

    ENGS COMMERCIAL FINANCE CO. V. CALIFORNIA FREIGHT, INC. ET AL.

  • Case No.

    16CECG01478

  • Hearing

    Jul 11, 2016

Code of Civil Procedure section 516.030 provides that affidavits in support of writs of possession must set forth “[t]he facts stated” “with particularity.” “Except where matters are specifically permitted by this chapter to be shown by information and belief, each affidavit shall show affirmatively that the affiant, if sworn as a witness, can testify competently to the facts stated therein.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 516.030.)

  • Name

    HITACHI CAPITAL AMERICA CORP. V. PANDHER

  • Case No.

    17CECG03675

  • Hearing

    Dec 20, 2017

  • Judge

    Jeff Hamilton

  • County

    Fresno County, CA

Code of Civil Procedure section 516.030 provides that affidavits in support of writs of possession must set forth “[t]he facts stated” “with particularity.” “Except where matters are specifically permitted by this chapter to be shown by information and belief, each affidavit shall show affirmatively that the affiant, if sworn as a witness, can testify competently to the facts stated therein.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 516.030.)

  • Name

    HITACHI CAPITAL AMERICA CORP. V. MONEY TRUCKING, INC., ET AL.

  • Case No.

    19CECG03762

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2020

View More Rulings

View Latest Dockets

8 Files
Filed

May 11, 2009

Status

Default Judgment

Judge

Hon. Lisa A. Novak Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Lisa A. Novak

Court

San Mateo County

County

San Mateo County, CA

Practice Area

Commercial

Matter Type

Breach of Contract

View More Dockets
Previous Section

Doc thumbnail Section 516.020.

Next Section

Doc thumbnail Section 516.040.

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 2 pages

Wes /SO544— 0/39 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Wane, Stole Ber number, ano odtran): Michael R. Asatourian, Esq., SBN: 285099 Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP 4665 MacArthur Court, Suite 280 ‘SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Contra Costa: sires aporess: 725 Court Street waunsanoress; 725 Court Street esvanpzpcoo: Martinez, CA 94553 srancusame Martinez, CA 94553 piaintiFe: SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC., et al. : JOHNATHON SIMON and DOES 1-100 inclusive | (CASE NUMBER: WRITOF POSSESSION (7…

Case Filed

Oct 22, 2014

Case Status

ACTIVE

County

Contra Costa County, CA

Filed Date

May 14, 2015

Judge Hon. Barry Baskin Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Barry Baskin
preview-icon 6 pages

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA - COUNTY OF FRESNO Entered by: Civil Department - Non-Limited TITLE 0F CASE: Hitachi Capital America Corp. vs. Parminder Singh Case Number: LAW AND MOTION MINUTE ORDER …

Case Filed

Oct 16, 2019

Case Status

Dismissed

County

Fresno County, CA

Filed Date

Feb 05, 2020

Judge Hon. Gaab, Kimberly Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Gaab, Kimberly
preview-icon 11 pages

CHASSMAN & SEELIG, LLP 1 Mark B. Chassman (SBN 119619) Ana Vasquez (SBN 231903) 2 1250 Sixth Street, Suite 403 Santa Monica, CA 90401 3 Telephone: (310) 929-7192 Facsimile: (310) 929-7627 4 Attorneys for Defendant 5 Rudra Investments, LLC …

Case Filed

Feb 18, 2022

Case Status

Stayed

County

Sonoma County, CA

Filed Date

Apr 21, 2022

Judge Hon. Broderick, Patrick Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Broderick, Patrick
View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope