California Laws|Section 1812.701.

                                                

1812.701.  

(a) The notice required in this title may be changed only as necessary to reflect changes under the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 1692 et seq.) that would otherwise make the disclosure inaccurate.

(b) The type-size used in the disclosure shall be at least the same type-size as that used to inform the debtor of his or her specific debt, but is not required to be larger than 12-point type.

(Amended by Stats. 2004, Ch. 183, Sec. 37. Effective January 1, 2005.)

View Latest Rulings

Plaintiff alleges that defendants routinely send initial written communications, like the one sent to her, that fail to provide the “Consumer Collection Notice” required by Civil Code section 1812.700, subdivision (a) in a type size that is at least the same as the type size used to inform the debtor of his or her specific debt or in at least 12-point type, in violation of Civil Code section 1812.701, subdivision (b). (Id. at ¶ 3.)

  • Name

    PAMELA SHEREÉ CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET

  • Case No.

    18-CV-324210

  • Hearing

    Jun 07, 2019

1812.701, 2 subdivision (b).

  • Name

    BRADY V. PATENAUDE & FELIX

  • Case No.

    18CV338737

  • Hearing

    Mar 10, 2021

The letter notified plaintiff of her specific debt in 12-point type, but, in violation of Civil Code section 1812.701, subdivision (b), provided the notice required by Civil Code section 1812.700, subdivision (a) in 10-point type. (Id. at ¶¶ 22-24.) Plaintiff alleges that sending initial collection letters with this formatting is defendant’s standard practice, and brings a putative class action on behalf of other WebBank debtors who received such a letter. (Complaint, ¶¶ 25-40.)

  • Name

    LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP, ET AL.

  • Case No.

    18-CV-322871

  • Hearing

    Sep 27, 2019

Wilson 28 arising from their routine practice of sending initial written communications that fail to provide TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 1 the “Consumer Collection Notice” required by California Civil Code section 1812.700, 2 subdivision (a), in a type-size that is at least the same type-size as that used to inform the debtor 3 of his or her specific debt or in at least 12-point type, in violation of California Civil Code 4 section 1812.701, subdivision (

  • Name

    CARLSON V. GATESTONE & CO. INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL.

  • Case No.

    17CV306698

  • Hearing

    Nov 30, 2019

Wilson 28 arising from their routine practice of sending initial written communications that fail to provide TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT; MOTION FOR FEES AND COSTS 1 the “Consumer Collection Notice” required by California Civil Code section 1812.700, 2 subdivision (a), in a type-size that is at least the same type-size as that used to inform the debtor 3 of his or her specific debt or in at least 12-point type, in violation of California Civil Code 4 section 1812.701

  • Name

    CARLSON V. GATESTONE & CO. INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL.

  • Case No.

    2017-1-CV-306698

  • Hearing

    Mar 29, 2019

View More Rulings

View Latest Dockets

34 Files
Filed

Jul 20, 2015

Status

Dismissal

Judge

Hon. Joseph Huber Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Joseph Huber

Court

Santa Clara

County

Santa Clara County, CA

Category

Other Complaint (Not Spec) Unlimited (42)

View More Dockets
Previous Section

Doc thumbnail Section 1812.700.

Next Section

Doc thumbnail Section 1812.702.

View Latest Documents

preview-icon 8 pages

17CV306698 Santa Clara — Civil Electronically Filed Fred W. Schwinn (SBN 225575) by Superior Court of CA, Raeon R. Roulston (SBN 255622) Matthew C. Salmonsen (SBN 302854) County of Santa Clara, …

Case Filed

Feb 23, 2017

Case Status

Inactive

County

Santa Clara County, CA

Filed Date

Mar 22, 2019

Category

Other Complaint (Not Spec) Unlimited (42)

Judge Hon. Brian C. Walsh Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Brian C. Walsh
preview-icon 7 pages

Christine Siduguen SB# 240380 MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP 9200 Oakdale Avenue, Suite 601 Chatsworth, CA 91311 Toll Free Telephone: 877.414.0130 Local:818.264.0111 Facsimile: 818-888-1260 christines@mandarichlaw.com Nicole M. Strickler IL Bar # 6298459 MESSER STRICKLER, LTD. 225 W. Washington Street, Suite 575 Chicago, IL 60606 (312) 334-3474 (312) 334-3473 (fax) 10 nstrickler@messerstrickler.com ll Attorneys for Def…

Case Filed

Feb 02, 2018

Case Status

Active

County

Santa Clara County, CA

Filed Date

Sep 19, 2019

Category

Other Complaint (Not Spec) Unlimited (42)

Judge Hon. Brian C. Walsh Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Brian C. Walsh
preview-icon 8 pages

oo Christine Siduguen SB# 240380 MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP 9200 Oakdale Avenue, Suite 601 Chatsworth, CA 91311 Toll Free Telephone: 877.414.0130 Local:818.264.0111 Facsimile: 818-888-1260 christines@mandarichlaw.com Nicole M. Strickler IL Bar # 6298459 MESSER STRICKLER, LTD. 225 W. Washington Street, Suite 575 Chicago, IL 60606 (312) 334-3474 (312) 334-3473 (fax) nstrickler@messerstrickler.com Attorneys for Defendant Mandarich Law Group, LLP SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA C…

Case Filed

Feb 02, 2018

Case Status

Active

County

Santa Clara County, CA

Filed Date

Jul 29, 2019

Category

Other Complaint (Not Spec) Unlimited (42)

Judge Hon. Brian C. Walsh Trellis Spinner 👉 Discover key insights by exploring more analytics for Brian C. Walsh
preview-icon 4 pages

ie SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA RCTS COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Se MINUTE ORDER LINE 1 Hearing Start Time: 9:00 AM Guzman v. Mandarich Law Group, LLP 18CV322871 Hearing Type: Motion: Reconsider Date of Hearing: …

Case Filed

Feb 02, 2018

Case Status

Active

County

Santa Clara County, CA

Filed Date

Sep 27, 2019

Category

Other Complaint (Not Spec) Unlimited (42)

preview-icon 4 pages

ie SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA RCTS COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Se MINUTE ORDER LINE 1 Hearing Start Time 9:00 AM Guzman v. Mandarich Law Group, LLP Hearing Type: Motion: Summary 18CV322871 …

Case Filed

Feb 02, 2018

Case Status

Active

County

Santa Clara County, CA

Filed Date

Jun 26, 2020

Category

Other Complaint (Not Spec) Unlimited (42)

View More Documents

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope