TYSOL v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
CASE NO.: VC067146
HEARING: 12/11/18
JUDGE: LORI ANN FOURNIER
#11
TENTATIVE ORDER
Defendant UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.’s demurrer to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint is SUSTAINED with 30 days leave to amend as to Defendant UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. CCP §430.10(e).
Moving Party to give notice.
The Court notes that the instant demurrer was filed by Defendant UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. (“UPS”) only. Therefore, the Court’s ruling on this demurrer is limited to the demurring party. As argued in Opposition, Defendant UPS lacks standing to assert defenses on behalf of the individual defendants where they are not named as one of the demurring parties herein.
This action for wrongful termination was filed by Plaintiff DENEE TYSOL on May 14, 2018. Plaintiff alleges that she was diagnosed with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome caused by work-related injuries, and as a result, was wrongfully terminated by Defendant UPS “for exercising her legal right not f
Hearing Date
December 11, 2018
Type
Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
TYSOL v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
CASE NO.: VC067146
HEARING: 12/11/18
JUDGE: LORI ANN FOURNIER
#11
TENTATIVE ORDER
Defendant UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.’s demurrer to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint is SUSTAINED with 30 days leave to amend as to Defendant UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. CCP §430.10(e).
Moving Party to give notice.
The Court notes that the instant demurrer was filed by Defendant UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. (“UPS”) only. Therefore, the Court’s ruling on this demurrer is limited to the demurring party. As argued in Opposition, Defendant UPS lacks standing to assert defenses on behalf of the individual defendants where they are not named as one of the demurring parties herein.
This action for wrongful termination was filed by Plaintiff DENEE TYSOL on May 14, 2018. Plaintiff alleges that she was diagnosed with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome caused by work-related injuries, and as a result, was wrongfully terminated by Defendant UPS “for exercising her legal right not f