PATEL v. MERIDIAN HEALTH SERVICES HOLDINGS, INC.
CASE NO.: VC064751
HEARING: 01/24/17
#4
TENTATIVE ORDER
I. Defendant KEITH SIMPSON’s demurrer to the Second Amended Complaint is SUSTAINED, with 20 days leave to amend. CCP §430.10(e).
II. Defendant KEITH SIMPSON’s motion to strike portions of the Second Amended Complaint is GRANTED, with 20 days leave to amend.
Plaintiffs AMAR PATEL, JESSAL PATEL, AMIT PATEL, PAYAL PATEL, RENU HARALAKA, MADHUSUDAN HARLALKA, SURENDRA PATEL and BHARATIBEN PATEL request for judicial notice of the underlying document is GRANTED pursuant to Evid. Code §§ 451 and 452 as to the existence of the documents, but not as to any hearsay statements contained therein.
Moving Party to give notice.
Plaintiffs AMAR PATEL, JESSAL PATEL, AMIT PATEL, PAYAL PATEL, RENU HARALAKA, MADHUSUDAN HARLALKA, SURENDRA PATEL and BHARATIBEN PATEL (“Plaintiffs”) assert 16 causes of action in their Second Amended Complaint against several defendants, and arising from a series o
Hearing Date
January 24, 2017
Type
Breach Contract/Warnty-Negligence (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
PATEL v. MERIDIAN HEALTH SERVICES HOLDINGS, INC.
CASE NO.: VC064751
HEARING: 01/24/17
#4
TENTATIVE ORDER
I. Defendant KEITH SIMPSON’s demurrer to the Second Amended Complaint is SUSTAINED, with 20 days leave to amend. CCP §430.10(e).
II. Defendant KEITH SIMPSON’s motion to strike portions of the Second Amended Complaint is GRANTED, with 20 days leave to amend.
Plaintiffs AMAR PATEL, JESSAL PATEL, AMIT PATEL, PAYAL PATEL, RENU HARALAKA, MADHUSUDAN HARLALKA, SURENDRA PATEL and BHARATIBEN PATEL request for judicial notice of the underlying document is GRANTED pursuant to Evid. Code §§ 451 and 452 as to the existence of the documents, but not as to any hearsay statements contained therein.
Moving Party to give notice.
Plaintiffs AMAR PATEL, JESSAL PATEL, AMIT PATEL, PAYAL PATEL, RENU HARALAKA, MADHUSUDAN HARLALKA, SURENDRA PATEL and BHARATIBEN PATEL (“Plaintiffs”) assert 16 causes of action in their Second Amended Complaint against several defendants, and arising from a series o