This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Frank Roesch A.H. Voss' motion for partial satisfaction of judgment is DENIED. The moving party fails to assert, as a factual matter, an amount it claims has been paid in satisfaction of the judgment, fails to assert, as a legal matter, the amount properly applied here as a credit using the Espinoza v. Machongo (9 Cal.App.4th 268) method of apportionment and calculation, and fails to establish that its demand letter, which does not identify an amount of its demand for partial satisfaction of judgment, is sufficient to underpin a motion under Code of Civil Procedure section 724.110.