[Part 1 of 2] This tentative ruling is issued by Judge Ross C. Moody. The moving party's Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. The opposing party's Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. (See Evid. Code sections 452, 453.) Judicial Notice is limited to the relevant facts properly subject to notice given the materials presented and does not, for example, extend to the truth of assertions in pleadings or transcripts. (See Richtek USA, Inc. v. UPI Semiconductor Corp. (2015) 242 Cal.App.4th 651, 659-660.) The meet and confer process here failed to comply with the requirements of Code of Civil Procedure section 430.41. All parties are required to comply with the statutory meet and confer requirements going forward. However, a determination by the court that the meet and confer process was insufficient is not grounds to overrule or sustain a demurrer (CCP section 430.41(a)(4)). Based on the moving and opposing papers, the Court does not believe that ordering the parties to engage in furth
Hearing Date
April 15, 2021
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
[Part 1 of 2] This tentative ruling is issued by Judge Ross C. Moody. The moving party's Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. The opposing party's Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. (See Evid. Code sections 452, 453.) Judicial Notice is limited to the relevant facts properly subject to notice given the materials presented and does not, for example, extend to the truth of assertions in pleadings or transcripts. (See Richtek USA, Inc. v. UPI Semiconductor Corp. (2015) 242 Cal.App.4th 651, 659-660.) The meet and confer process here failed to comply with the requirements of Code of Civil Procedure section 430.41. All parties are required to comply with the statutory meet and confer requirements going forward. However, a determination by the court that the meet and confer process was insufficient is not grounds to overrule or sustain a demurrer (CCP section 430.41(a)(4)). Based on the moving and opposing papers, the Court does not believe that ordering the parties to engage in furth