HEARING ON MOTION TO SET ASIDE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SATISFACTION OF

JUDGMENT / FILED BY IRAJ ISAD-PANA

* TENTATIVE RULING: *

Plaintiff Iraj Isad-Pana’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Set Aside Acknowledgment of Satisfaction of Judgment against Nader Eghtesad (“Defendant”) is denied. The basis for this ruling is as follows:

Requests for Judicial Notice

As a preliminary matter, the Court advises all parties to separately specify which section(s) of the Evidence Code pertain to any materials or set of materials submitted for judicial notice. Requesting broad judicial notice for sets of materials, without specifying which Evidence Code section applies to a given set, may not adequately express the logic for judicial notice of those materials to the Court. In this, the Court seeks to clarify for all parties.

The Court takes judicial notice of Plaintiff’s unopposed Exhibits A – C, and G, under Evidence Code § 452(d), noting for the benefit of all parties that requests for judicial notice of fil