Elam v. NWAFOR Enterprises, Inc., et al. (KC067742)


1. Cross-Complainant NWAFOR Enterprises, Inc.’s MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITIONS OF CROSS-DEFENDANT DEALERS AUTO AUCTION OF THE SOUTHWEST

Respondent: Cross-Defendant Dealers Auto Action of the Southwest

2. Specially Appearing Cross-Defendant Dealers Auto Auction of the Southwest’s MOTION TO QUASH

Respondent: Cross-Complainant NWAFOR Enterprises, Inc.




TENTATIVE RULING

1. Motion to Compel

Cross-Complainant NWAFOR Enterprises, Inc.’s motion to compel depositions of cross-defendant Dealers Auto Auction of the Southwest is DENIED. No sanctions.

Cross-Complainant NWAFOR Enterprises, Inc. (“NWAFOR”) moves to compel jurisdictional discovery to oppose Cross-Defendant Dealers Auto Auction of the Southwest (“DAATS”)’s motion to quash per CCP 2025.450 and Mihlon v. Superior Court (1985) 169 Cal.App.3d 703, 710.

When jurisdiction is challenged by a nonresident defendant, the burden of proof is upon the plaintiff to demonstrate that "