FL-22-002535 – WEBSTER VS WEBSTER
Petitioner’s Request for Order re “Violation of ATRO’s,” etc.—HEARING REQUIRED.
Temporary orders were granted and the hearing Petitioner’s order request has been continued three times for non-service. There is, once again, no proof of service on file and no responsive declaration by Respondent despite both parties having counsel of record. Unless Petitioner’s counsel demonstrates due diligence with respect to service, and compliance with the meet and confer requirement, the Court is inclined to deny the motion without prejudice and terminate temporary orders. (Cal. Rules of Ct., rules 5.94(b), 5.92, and 5.98.)
Hearing Date
January 24, 2023
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
FL-22-002535 – WEBSTER VS WEBSTER
Petitioner’s Request for Order re “Violation of ATRO’s,” etc.—HEARING REQUIRED.
Temporary orders were granted and the hearing Petitioner’s order request has been continued three times for non-service. There is, once again, no proof of service on file and no responsive declaration by Respondent despite both parties having counsel of record. Unless Petitioner’s counsel demonstrates due diligence with respect to service, and compliance with the meet and confer requirement, the Court is inclined to deny the motion without prejudice and terminate temporary orders. (Cal. Rules of Ct., rules 5.94(b), 5.92, and 5.98.)