FL-20-001807 – CASTELLANOS VS MONTANEZ
Respondent’s Request for Order re Child Custody, etc.—HEARING REQUIRED, in part; DENIED, without prejudice, in part.
All requests but for the “Escalade Payment,” etc., are not eligible for tentative ruling and require a hearing.
Judgment in this matter was entered on November 24, 2020.  The Court has no authority to modify or rewrite the terms of a final judgment.  The Court only has authority to enforce the terms of the judgment as-is.  The Escalade payment request is therefore denied without prejudice.  However, the parties are free to do with their own separate property post-judgment as they wish and are encouraged to meet and confer in an attempt to come to an agreement.
431148 – MACIA VS DOMINGUEZ
Petitioner’s Request for Order re “Additional Orders,” etc.—HEARING REQUIRED.
Respondent’s Responsive Declaration alleges that Petitioner’s post-judgment request to have her name removed from the loan on the subject property has already been accompl