2. CV60992 Monica Dunkel v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al.
Pleading: Demurrer to second amended complaint
Demurring party: Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Demurrer filed: August 2, 2018
Motion: Strike portions of second amended complaint
Moving party: Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Motion filed: August 2, 2018
Tentative rulings: No tentative rulings are available in light of the request for continuance filed on October 3, 2018. The hearings shall be CONTINUED as set forth below.
Analysis
The parties waited until mid-afternoon of October 3, 2018—fewer than 48 hours prior to the hearings—to file a stipulation to continue the hearings. The Court already had completed its analysis of the instant demurrer prior to receiving the stipulation. The parties are reminded that local rule 3.02 [see footnote below] governs requests for continuances and expresses an expectation that parties planning to request a continuance do so as soon as practicable because the Court reviews calendared
Hearing Date
October 05, 2018
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
2. CV60992 Monica Dunkel v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al.
Pleading: Demurrer to second amended complaint
Demurring party: Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Demurrer filed: August 2, 2018
Motion: Strike portions of second amended complaint
Moving party: Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Motion filed: August 2, 2018
Tentative rulings: No tentative rulings are available in light of the request for continuance filed on October 3, 2018. The hearings shall be CONTINUED as set forth below.
Analysis
The parties waited until mid-afternoon of October 3, 2018—fewer than 48 hours prior to the hearings—to file a stipulation to continue the hearings. The Court already had completed its analysis of the instant demurrer prior to receiving the stipulation. The parties are reminded that local rule 3.02 [see footnote below] governs requests for continuances and expresses an expectation that parties planning to request a continuance do so as soon as practicable because the Court reviews calendared