CV-22-004649 – DAVIES, KARLHA vs STATE OF CALIFORNIA – a) Defendant CSU’s Demurrer to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint – SUSTAINED, without leave to amend; b) Defendant Susan Johnston and Adrian Harrell’s Demurrer to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint – SUSTAINED, without leave to amend.
a) The Court finds that Plaintiff’s additions to the current version of the pleading consist primarily of conclusory allegations and do not contain any additional facts beyond what was alleged in the First Amended Complaint. Therefore, the Court finds that the Second Amended Complaint fails to state facts supporting the 2nd, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 12th, 13th, 14th, 15th, 16th, and 17th causes of action stated therein. With regard to the claims based on Plaintiff’s alleged disability, the pleading lacks specific factual allegations establishing that Plaintiff suffered from a condition that constituted a disability, as that concept is defined by FEHA. In addition, the pleading lacks specific fact