Tentative ruling by Judge HAROLD E. KAHN: ROBERT LIGHTFOOT VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al, Jul. 17, 2012

Case Name: ROBERT LIGHTFOOT VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al

Case No.: (Subscribe to View)

On July 17, 2012, Judge HAROLD E. KAHN of San Francisco County Superior Court, Department 302, issued the following tentative ruling.

The Reference Case No.: (Subscribe to View) San Francisco County, California. Hearing Date 07.17.2012.

View Case Records and Case History

Notice Of Motion To Dismiss Under Civ. Proc. 583.210, Request For Judicial Notice

MATTER ON CALENDAR FOR TUESDAY, JULY 17, 2012, LINE 1, DEFENDANT MCGUIRE AND HESTER Motion To Dismiss Under Civ. Proc. 583.210.

Granted per Code of Civil Procedure sections 583.210 and 583.250. Defendant was not properly served within the mandatory three-year time period. A general appearance by the Defendant after the three-year period does not cure the defective service or preclude Defendant from seeking dismissal. (Brookview Condominium Owners' Association v. Heltzer Enterprises, (1990) 218 Cal.App.3d 502; Busching v. Superior Court, (1974) 12 Cal.3d 44.) Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order repeating verbatim the substantive portion of t….....

Case Info

Judge

HAROLD E. KAHN

Case No.

(Subscribe to View)

Hearing Date

July 17, 2012

County

San Francisco County, CA

Department

302

Docket Filing date

December 30, 2008

Parties

CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPO… Defendant
CATELLUS LAND AND DEVELOPM… Cross complainant
CATELLUS LAND AND DEVELOPM… Cross defendant
CATELLUS LAND AND DEVELOPM… Defendant
CHRISTOPHER B. DOLAN Attorney for plaintiff
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRA… Cross complainant
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRA… Cross defendant
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRA… Defendant
CONSUKLTING ENGINEERS Cross defendant
DAVID AUGUST DELBON Attorney for cross complai…
DAVID AUGUST DELBON Attorney for cross defenda…
DAVID AUGUST DELBON Attorney for defendant
DOES 1 TO 20 Defendant
EDWARD SIPES Attorney for cross complai…
EDWARD SIPES Attorney for cross defenda…
EDWARD SIPES Attorney for defendant
HORN, CHARLES HENRY (Deact… Attorney for cross complai…
HORN, CHARLES HENRY (Deact… Attorney for cross defenda…
HORN, CHARLES HENRY (Deact… Attorney for defendant
JAMES CHARLES HYDE Attorney for cross defenda…
JAMES CHARLES HYDE Attorney for defendant
JAMES PATRICK CASTLES Attorney for defendant
JOINT POWERS BOARD Cross defendant
JOSHUA SETH GOODMAN Attorney for defendant
KIMON MANOLIUS Attorney for cross defenda…
KIMON MANOLIUS Attorney for defendant
MARK E MEREDITH Attorney for cross defenda…
MCGUIRE & HESTER FOUND… Defendant
MCGUIRE AND HESTER Cross complainant
MCGUIRE AND HESTER Cross defendant
MCGUIRE AND HESTER Defendant
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGE… Defendant
NATIONAL RAILWAY PASSENGER… Defendant
PENINSULA CORRIDER JOINT P… Defendant
PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT P… Cross defendant
PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT P… Defendant
ROBERT LIGHTFOOT Plaintiff
ROES 1 TO 50 Cross defendant
ROES 1-10 Cross defendant
ROES 1-25 Cross defendant
ROES 1-50 Cross defendant
ST. FRANCIS ELECTRIC Cross defendant
ST. FRANCIS ELECTRIC, INC. Cross defendant
ST. FRANCIS ELECTRIC, INC. Defendant
SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO W… Defendant
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD Defendant
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COM… Cross complainant
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COM… Cross defendant
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COM… Defendant
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COM… Cross defendant
WINZLER & KELLY CONSU… Cross defendant
WINZLER & KELLY Cross defendant
WINZLER & KELLY Defendant

Other rulings in case

Other rulings by Hon. HAROLD E. KAHN

Request redaction

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Tentative ruling issued by Judge HAROLD E. KAHN on Jul. 17, 2012 in San Francisco County, CA - Case no: xxxxx640