Case Number:
BC658722
Hearing Date:
May 2, 2022
Dept:
37
LOS
ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
DIONNE GRAM, an individual,
Plaintiff,
vs.
LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY, a public entity: and does 1 through 50, inclusive
Defendants
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. BC658722
Hon. RICHARD J. BURDGE JR.
Dept.
37
PROPOSED STATEMENT OF DECISION
On April 4. 2022, Cross-Complainant Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) filed a request for a statement of decision regarding the courts decision on the MTAs Cross-Complaint.
It specifically requested the following issues be addressed:
1.
Whether the statute of limitations barred the cross-complaint for breach of contract when:
a.
The statute of limitations
Hearing Date
May 02, 2022
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Case Number:
BC658722
Hearing Date:
May 2, 2022
Dept:
37
LOS
ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
DIONNE GRAM, an individual,
Plaintiff,
vs.
LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY, a public entity: and does 1 through 50, inclusive
Defendants
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. BC658722
Hon. RICHARD J. BURDGE JR.
Dept.
37
PROPOSED STATEMENT OF DECISION
On April 4. 2022, Cross-Complainant Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) filed a request for a statement of decision regarding the courts decision on the MTAs Cross-Complaint.
It specifically requested the following issues be addressed:
1.
Whether the statute of limitations barred the cross-complaint for breach of contract when:
a.
The statute of limitations