GUSTAVO RAMIREZ, Plaintiff, vs. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant
Case No.: BC631562
[TENTATIVE] ORDER OVERRULING DEMURRER
Background
On August 24, 2016, Plaintiff Gustavo Ramirez (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint against Defendants Ford Motor Company (“Defendant”) and Does 1 through 10 for (1) breach of express warranty – violation of Song-Beverly Act; (2) breach of implied warranty – violation of Song-Beverly Act; (3) fraudulent inducement – concealment; (4) fraudulent inducement – intentional misrepresentation; and (5) fraudulent inducement – negligent misrepresentation. Plaintiff alleges he purchased a new 2013 Ford Focus on August 30, 2013 from Ford of Montebello. Plaintiff alleges the purchase came with express warranties by which Defendant undertook to preserve or maintain the utility or performance of Plaintiff’s vehicle or provide compensation if there was a failure in utility or performance. Plaintiff alleges the vehicle was delivered to him with serious defects and nonconformi
Hearing Date
August 14, 2017
Type
Breach Contrct/Warnty (Sellr Pltf) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
GUSTAVO RAMIREZ, Plaintiff, vs. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant
Case No.: BC631562
[TENTATIVE] ORDER OVERRULING DEMURRER
Background
On August 24, 2016, Plaintiff Gustavo Ramirez (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint against Defendants Ford Motor Company (“Defendant”) and Does 1 through 10 for (1) breach of express warranty – violation of Song-Beverly Act; (2) breach of implied warranty – violation of Song-Beverly Act; (3) fraudulent inducement – concealment; (4) fraudulent inducement – intentional misrepresentation; and (5) fraudulent inducement – negligent misrepresentation. Plaintiff alleges he purchased a new 2013 Ford Focus on August 30, 2013 from Ford of Montebello. Plaintiff alleges the purchase came with express warranties by which Defendant undertook to preserve or maintain the utility or performance of Plaintiff’s vehicle or provide compensation if there was a failure in utility or performance. Plaintiff alleges the vehicle was delivered to him with serious defects and nonconformi