Background
This employment action involves allegations of race discrimination and related claims. On August 1, 2016, plaintiff filed a complaint against his former employer. On November 3, 2016, defendants filed this opposed motion to compel arbitration. The Court considered the moving, opposition, and reply papers, and DENIES the motion as follows.
Defendant should avoid revealing social security numbers. See Exh. B.
Request for Judicial Notice
Defendant’s request for judicial notice of the complaint is DENIED as superfluous. Defendant’s request for judicial notice of the AAA rules is DENIED as irrelevant.
Motion to Compel Arbitration Standard
When a motion to compel arbitration is filed and accompanied by prima facie evidence of a written agreement to arbitrate the controversy, the court itself must determine whether the agreement exists and, if any defense to its enforcement is raised, and whether it is enforceable. Because the existence of the agreement is a statutory pr
Hearing Date
December 08, 2016
Type
Other Employment Complaint (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Background
This employment action involves allegations of race discrimination and related claims. On August 1, 2016, plaintiff filed a complaint against his former employer. On November 3, 2016, defendants filed this opposed motion to compel arbitration. The Court considered the moving, opposition, and reply papers, and DENIES the motion as follows.
Defendant should avoid revealing social security numbers. See Exh. B.
Request for Judicial Notice
Defendant’s request for judicial notice of the complaint is DENIED as superfluous. Defendant’s request for judicial notice of the AAA rules is DENIED as irrelevant.
Motion to Compel Arbitration Standard
When a motion to compel arbitration is filed and accompanied by prima facie evidence of a written agreement to arbitrate the controversy, the court itself must determine whether the agreement exists and, if any defense to its enforcement is raised, and whether it is enforceable. Because the existence of the agreement is a statutory pr