CASE NAME: Bobadilla v. Amor, et al.
CASE NO.: BC606395
HEARING DATE: 1/24/19
DEPARTMENT: 37
CALENDAR NO.: 8
DATE FILED: 1/8/16
FSC/TRIAL DATE: None
NOTICE: OK
SUBJECT: Motion for Attorney’s Fees
MOVING PARTY: Defendant and Cross-Complainant Maria Amor
OPPOSING PARTY: Jaime Bobadilla
The Court is inclined to GRANT Defendant’s motion for attorney’s fees in the amount of $26,460 and costs in the amount of $1,379.00 for a total award of attorney’s fees and costs of $27,839.00. Counsel for Defendant to give notice.
This case arises in connection with a lease agreement (the “Lease”) between Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant Jaime Bobadilla (“Bobadilla”) and the prior owner of the real property located at 323 W. Huntington Drive, Monrovia, CA (the “Subject Property”). Defendant and Cross-Complainant Maria Amor (“Amor”) purchased the Subject Property in 2006 and thereafter became the landlord of Plaintiff. In the Complaint, Plaintiff alleged that Defendant breached the terms of the Le
Hearing Date
January 24, 2019
Type
Breach of Rental/Lease Contract (not unlawful detainer or wrongful eviction) (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Legacy Judgment 08/07/2018
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
CASE NAME: Bobadilla v. Amor, et al.
CASE NO.: BC606395
HEARING DATE: 1/24/19
DEPARTMENT: 37
CALENDAR NO.: 8
DATE FILED: 1/8/16
FSC/TRIAL DATE: None
NOTICE: OK
SUBJECT: Motion for Attorney’s Fees
MOVING PARTY: Defendant and Cross-Complainant Maria Amor
OPPOSING PARTY: Jaime Bobadilla
The Court is inclined to GRANT Defendant’s motion for attorney’s fees in the amount of $26,460 and costs in the amount of $1,379.00 for a total award of attorney’s fees and costs of $27,839.00. Counsel for Defendant to give notice.
This case arises in connection with a lease agreement (the “Lease”) between Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant Jaime Bobadilla (“Bobadilla”) and the prior owner of the real property located at 323 W. Huntington Drive, Monrovia, CA (the “Subject Property”). Defendant and Cross-Complainant Maria Amor (“Amor”) purchased the Subject Property in 2006 and thereafter became the landlord of Plaintiff. In the Complaint, Plaintiff alleged that Defendant breached the terms of the Le