John Doe v Five Acres, the Boy’ and Girls’ Scoiety of Los Angeles County
MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT,
MOTION TO SET ASIDE NET RECOVERY, &
MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES
Calendar: 1
Case No: BC544628
Date: 8/11/17
MP: Plaintiff, John Doe
RP: Defendant, Five Acres - The Boys’ and Girls’ Aid Society
RELIEF REQUESTED:
1. Plaintiff, John Doe
Order compelling Defendant to comply with settlement agreement or setting trial on issue of punitive damages.
Order directing Defendant to pay attorney’s fees.
2. Defendant, Five Acres - The Boys’ and Girls’ Aid Society
Order setting aside net recovery
Order striking or taxing costs from memorandum of costs
DISCUSSION:
This case arises from the Plaintiff’s claim that he suffered personal injuries because he was sexually abused on an ongoing basis by a DOE perpetrator while he was on the premises of the Defendant, Five Acres. The Plaintiff is in the child welfare system and was placed in the Defendant’s residential
Hearing Date
August 11, 2017
Type
Other PI/PD/WD (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
John Doe v Five Acres, the Boy’ and Girls’ Scoiety of Los Angeles County
MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT,
MOTION TO SET ASIDE NET RECOVERY, &
MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES
Calendar: 1
Case No: BC544628
Date: 8/11/17
MP: Plaintiff, John Doe
RP: Defendant, Five Acres - The Boys’ and Girls’ Aid Society
RELIEF REQUESTED:
1. Plaintiff, John Doe
Order compelling Defendant to comply with settlement agreement or setting trial on issue of punitive damages.
Order directing Defendant to pay attorney’s fees.
2. Defendant, Five Acres - The Boys’ and Girls’ Aid Society
Order setting aside net recovery
Order striking or taxing costs from memorandum of costs
DISCUSSION:
This case arises from the Plaintiff’s claim that he suffered personal injuries because he was sexually abused on an ongoing basis by a DOE perpetrator while he was on the premises of the Defendant, Five Acres. The Plaintiff is in the child welfare system and was placed in the Defendant’s residential