SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - NORTHWEST DISTRICT
SAUL ARMAS, Plaintiff, vs. 9510 VAN NUYS BLVD., LLC, a California limited liability company; SUMMER VIEW APARTMENTS, ANZA MANAGEMENT COMPANY, a California corporation, and DOES 1 – 20, inclusive,
Defendants.
CASE NO: LC105434
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: 9150 VAN NUYS BLVD., LLC & ANZA MANAGEMENT COMPANY’S MOTION FOR ORDER QUASHING NOTICE OF LEVY AND MOTION FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS
Dept. U
8:30 a.m.
June 24, 2020
Saul Armas (Plaintiff) filed a complaint against 9150 Van Nuys Blvd., LLC, Summer View Apartments, Anza Management Company, and Does 1-20, alleging: (1) breach of the warranty of habitability; (2) breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment; (3) nuisance – Civil Code section 3479; (4) untenantable dwelling – Civil Code section 1924.4; (5) negligence; (6) violation of LAMC section 151.05(A); (7) violation of LAMC section 151.09(G); and (8) unlawful business practice in violation of Busine
Hearing Date
June 24, 2020
Type
Breach of Rental/Lease Contract (not unlawful detainer or wrongful eviction) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - NORTHWEST DISTRICT
SAUL ARMAS, Plaintiff, vs. 9510 VAN NUYS BLVD., LLC, a California limited liability company; SUMMER VIEW APARTMENTS, ANZA MANAGEMENT COMPANY, a California corporation, and DOES 1 – 20, inclusive,
Defendants.
CASE NO: LC105434
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: 9150 VAN NUYS BLVD., LLC & ANZA MANAGEMENT COMPANY’S MOTION FOR ORDER QUASHING NOTICE OF LEVY AND MOTION FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS
Dept. U
8:30 a.m.
June 24, 2020
Saul Armas (Plaintiff) filed a complaint against 9150 Van Nuys Blvd., LLC, Summer View Apartments, Anza Management Company, and Does 1-20, alleging: (1) breach of the warranty of habitability; (2) breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment; (3) nuisance – Civil Code section 3479; (4) untenantable dwelling – Civil Code section 1924.4; (5) negligence; (6) violation of LAMC section 151.05(A); (7) violation of LAMC section 151.09(G); and (8) unlawful business practice in violation of Busine