2. CVL61427 First National Bank of Omaha v. Gale M. Waggoner Motion: Motion to Dismiss Complaint
Moving party: Defendant Gale M. Waggoner
Motion filed: November 9, 2018
As a limited civil case, this case is not governed by local rule 3.11 [see footnote below] regarding tentative rulings. Accordingly, the following information is being provided to assist the parties based on the Court’s review of the papers prior to the hearing date and should not be construed as a tentative ruling:
On March 8, 2018, Plaintiff filed its complaint, alleging a single cause of action for common counts. On May 11, 2018, Defendant filed a document titled “Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Plainitiff’s [sic] Complaint and/or in the Alternative, Counterclaim for Damages” (hereafter Answer). The Answer is 31 pages long. It includes, among other things, a general denial of the allegations in the complaint, more than three pages of affirmative defenses, legal argument about the requirements under the federal
Hearing Date
January 25, 2019
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
2. CVL61427 First National Bank of Omaha v. Gale M. Waggoner Motion: Motion to Dismiss Complaint
Moving party: Defendant Gale M. Waggoner
Motion filed: November 9, 2018
As a limited civil case, this case is not governed by local rule 3.11 [see footnote below] regarding tentative rulings. Accordingly, the following information is being provided to assist the parties based on the Court’s review of the papers prior to the hearing date and should not be construed as a tentative ruling:
On March 8, 2018, Plaintiff filed its complaint, alleging a single cause of action for common counts. On May 11, 2018, Defendant filed a document titled “Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Plainitiff’s [sic] Complaint and/or in the Alternative, Counterclaim for Damages” (hereafter Answer). The Answer is 31 pages long. It includes, among other things, a general denial of the allegations in the complaint, more than three pages of affirmative defenses, legal argument about the requirements under the federal