Defendant Dignity Health dba Woodland Memorial Hospital’s motion to compel compliance
with the subpoena directed to Dr. Safaei-Far is DENIED. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1987.1.)
Defendant has not shown good cause for discovery of the third party’s privileged records, each
of which has entries that pertain to plaintiff and the third party. (Safaei-Far Decl., ¶¶ 3-5.)
Plaintiff Mindy Kazminy has withdrawn her motion to compel further responses to special
interrogatories, set two, and motion to compel further responses to requests for production of
documents for the depositions of Denise Foreman and Tony Robinson. Her motion to compel
further responses to requests for production, set two, is DENIED. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.310,
subd. (a).) Plaintiff fails to “set forth specific facts showing good cause justifying the discovery
sought by” each demand in her separate statement. (Emphasis added, Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.
310, subd. (b)(1); Kirkland v. Sup. Ct. (Guess?, Inc.) (2002) 95 Cal.App.4th 9
Hearing Date
June 28, 2018
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Defendant Dignity Health dba Woodland Memorial Hospital’s motion to compel compliance
with the subpoena directed to Dr. Safaei-Far is DENIED. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1987.1.)
Defendant has not shown good cause for discovery of the third party’s privileged records, each
of which has entries that pertain to plaintiff and the third party. (Safaei-Far Decl., ¶¶ 3-5.)
Plaintiff Mindy Kazminy has withdrawn her motion to compel further responses to special
interrogatories, set two, and motion to compel further responses to requests for production of
documents for the depositions of Denise Foreman and Tony Robinson. Her motion to compel
further responses to requests for production, set two, is DENIED. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.310,
subd. (a).) Plaintiff fails to “set forth specific facts showing good cause justifying the discovery
sought by” each demand in her separate statement. (Emphasis added, Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.
310, subd. (b)(1); Kirkland v. Sup. Ct. (Guess?, Inc.) (2002) 95 Cal.App.4th 9