Council on American-Islamic Relations-California, et al. v. Los Angeles Mayor’s Office of Public Safety, et al., BS174139
Tentative decision on petition for writ of mandate: granted in large part
Petitioners Council on American-Islamic Relations, Vigilant Love Coalition, Asian Americans Advancing Justice-Los Angeles, and American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Southern California petition the court for a writ of mandate directing Respondents Los Angeles Mayor’s Office of Public Safety (“MOPS”), Los Angeles Human Relations Commission (“HRC”), and the Los Angeles Police Department (“LAPD”) (collectively, “City”)[1] to conduct searches for Petitioners’ specified search terms and to produce all documents responsive to Petitioners’ California Public Records Act (“CPRA”) request.
The court has read and considered the moving papers, opposition, and reply, and renders the following tentative decision.
A. Statement of the Case
1. Petition
Petitioners commenced this action on June 28,
Hearing Date
December 10, 2019
Type
Other Writ /Judicial Review (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Council on American-Islamic Relations-California, et al. v. Los Angeles Mayor’s Office of Public Safety, et al., BS174139
Tentative decision on petition for writ of mandate: granted in large part
Petitioners Council on American-Islamic Relations, Vigilant Love Coalition, Asian Americans Advancing Justice-Los Angeles, and American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Southern California petition the court for a writ of mandate directing Respondents Los Angeles Mayor’s Office of Public Safety (“MOPS”), Los Angeles Human Relations Commission (“HRC”), and the Los Angeles Police Department (“LAPD”) (collectively, “City”)[1] to conduct searches for Petitioners’ specified search terms and to produce all documents responsive to Petitioners’ California Public Records Act (“CPRA”) request.
The court has read and considered the moving papers, opposition, and reply, and renders the following tentative decision.
A. Statement of the Case
1. Petition
Petitioners commenced this action on June 28,