Motion for Summary Judgement
Having considered the moving papers, the Court rules as follows. No opposing papers were filed.
BACKGROUND
On June 28, 2018, Plaintiff Jose Federico Gonzales (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint against Defendants Christopher Stewart Lee, Caroline Son, and Michael Cofsky alleging strict liability and negligence for a dog bite that occurred on June 30, 2016.
On April 5, 2019, Defendant/Cross-Complainant Michael Cofsky filed a cross-complaint against Defendant/Cross-Defendant Christopher Stewart Lee seeking equitable indemnity, contribution, and apportionment.
On August 30, 2019, Defendant/Cross-Complainant Michael Cofsky filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 437c.
Trial is set for December 30, 2019.
PARTY’S REQUEST
Defendant/Cross-Complainant Michael Cofsky (“Moving Party”) asks the Court to grant summary judgment in his favor and against Plaintiff because he did not have actual knowledge of the subject
Hearing Date
November 22, 2019
Type
Other Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Motion for Summary Judgement
Having considered the moving papers, the Court rules as follows. No opposing papers were filed.
BACKGROUND
On June 28, 2018, Plaintiff Jose Federico Gonzales (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint against Defendants Christopher Stewart Lee, Caroline Son, and Michael Cofsky alleging strict liability and negligence for a dog bite that occurred on June 30, 2016.
On April 5, 2019, Defendant/Cross-Complainant Michael Cofsky filed a cross-complaint against Defendant/Cross-Defendant Christopher Stewart Lee seeking equitable indemnity, contribution, and apportionment.
On August 30, 2019, Defendant/Cross-Complainant Michael Cofsky filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 437c.
Trial is set for December 30, 2019.
PARTY’S REQUEST
Defendant/Cross-Complainant Michael Cofsky (“Moving Party”) asks the Court to grant summary judgment in his favor and against Plaintiff because he did not have actual knowledge of the subject