Hortencia Palacios, Plaintiff, v. City of Huntington Park, et al., Defendants.
Case No.: BC620480
Hearing Date: September 25, 2018
[TENTATIVE] order RE:
Defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to ccp §581(f)(2) for failure of plaintiff to amend within time allowed by the court
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Maria Garcia Rodriguez (“Plaintiff”) commenced this action on May 13, 2016 against defendant City of Huntington Park (“Defendant”). Plaintiff alleges that on March 30, 2015, she tripped and fell as a result of an unsafe condition on a sidewalk owned or maintained by Defendant.
On March 7, 2018, the Court sustained Defendant’s demurrer to the complaint for failure to allege compliance with the Government Code § 911.2. The Court granted Plaintiff leave to amend the complaint within 10 days of notice of the Court’s order. Defendant served and filed a notice of ruling on Plaintiff’s counsel on March 8, 2018. Plaintiff did not amend within the period allowed by the Cour
Hearing Date
September 25, 2018
Type
Premises Liablty (e.g. slip & fall (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Hortencia Palacios, Plaintiff, v. City of Huntington Park, et al., Defendants.
Case No.: BC620480
Hearing Date: September 25, 2018
[TENTATIVE] order RE:
Defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to ccp §581(f)(2) for failure of plaintiff to amend within time allowed by the court
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Maria Garcia Rodriguez (“Plaintiff”) commenced this action on May 13, 2016 against defendant City of Huntington Park (“Defendant”). Plaintiff alleges that on March 30, 2015, she tripped and fell as a result of an unsafe condition on a sidewalk owned or maintained by Defendant.
On March 7, 2018, the Court sustained Defendant’s demurrer to the complaint for failure to allege compliance with the Government Code § 911.2. The Court granted Plaintiff leave to amend the complaint within 10 days of notice of the Court’s order. Defendant served and filed a notice of ruling on Plaintiff’s counsel on March 8, 2018. Plaintiff did not amend within the period allowed by the Cour