August 28, 2015
40
Civil - Unlimited
PI/PD/WD - Auto
Briones, Francisco A (Plaintiff), represented by MARK K FLORES
Track This PartyZink, Christopher Lee (Defendant), represented by James P. Hart
Track This PartyBaez, Francisco B (Cross - Defendant)
Track This PartyZink, Christopher Lee (Cross - Complainant), represented by James P. Hart
Track This PartyBaez, Francisco B (Cross - Defendant)
Track This PartyLanderos, Lourdes Galavis (Cross - Defendant), represented by MARK K FLORES
Track This PartyLanderos, Lourdes Galavis (Cross - Defendant)
Track This PartyZink, Christopher Lee (Cross - Complainant), represented by James P. Hart
Track This PartyBaez, Francisco B (Cross - Defendant)
Track This PartyClock Towers Inn LLC (Cross - Defendant)
Track This PartyClock Towers Inn Llc (Cross - Defendant), represented by William M Slaughter
Track This PartyClocktower Inn Inc (Cross - Defendant)
Track This PartyLanderos, Lourdes Galavis (Cross - Defendant), represented by MARK K FLORES
Track This PartyMorcos, Makram (Cross - Defendant)
Track This PartyZink, Christopher Lee (Cross - Complainant), represented by Bruce A Finck
Track This PartyZink, Christopher Lee (Cross - Complainant), represented by James P. Hart
Track This PartyClock Towers Inn Llc (Respondent on Appeal), represented by William M Slaughter
Track This PartyZink, Christopher Lee (Appellant), represented by Bruce A Finck
Track This PartyZink, Christopher Lee (Appellant), represented by James P. Hart
Track This PartyBriones, Francisco A (Respondent on Appeal), represented by GARY A. DORDICK
Track This PartyBriones, Francisco A (Respondent on Appeal), represented by MARK K FLORES
Track This PartyZink, Christopher Lee (Appellant), represented by Bruce A Finck
Track This PartyZink, Christopher Lee (Appellant), represented by James P. Hart
Track This PartyBriones, Francisco A (Respondent on Appeal), represented by GARY A. DORDICK
Track This PartyBriones, Francisco A (Respondent on Appeal), represented by MARK K FLORES
Track This PartyZink, Christopher Lee (Appellant), represented by Karen M Bray
Track This PartyZink, Christopher Lee (Appellant), represented by Bruce A Finck
Track This PartyZink, Christopher Lee (Appellant), represented by James P. Hart
Track This PartyZink, Christopher Lee (Appellant), represented by John A Taylor
Track This PartyBriones, Francisco A (Respondent on Appeal), represented by GARY A. DORDICK
Track This PartyBriones, Francisco A (Respondent on Appeal), represented by MARK K FLORES
Track This PartyZink, Christopher Lee (Appellant), represented by Karen M Bray
Track This PartyZink, Christopher Lee (Appellant), represented by Bruce A Finck
Track This PartyZink, Christopher Lee (Appellant), represented by James P. Hart
Track This PartyZink, Christopher Lee (Appellant), represented by John A Taylor
Track This Party2016-06-10T08:20:00
2015-09-18T08:20:00
2015-06-16T08:20:00
2015-02-18T08:15:00
2015-01-22T08:20:00
2015-01-14T08:15:00
2014-11-10T08:15:00
2014-09-22T08:15:00
2014-08-20T08:20:00
2014-08-08T08:15:00
2014-04-09T08:15:00
2014-01-15T08:15:00
2014-01-14T08:20:00
2013-12-02T08:15:00
2013-09-27T08:15:00
2013-09-12T08:20:00
2013-06-25T08:20:00
Balboa Collection Service vs. Henry
Fidelity Creditor Service Inc vs. Joanie L. Virgili
Fillmore & Western Railroad Inc vs. Darren Kettle
Bryan Willson vs Kamdar
Advanced Search Partners Inc vs. Jennifer Bowles
Gamble vs. Garda
Lefler vs HSBC Bank USA
Jose L Alatorre vs. Nationstar Mortgage LLC
United Water vs Pleasanty Valley County Water
Petra Garcia vs. Gold Coast Ambulance Service
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.
No notice of intent to appear is required. If you wish to submit on the tentative decision, you may send a telefax to Judge Riley's secretary at 805-662-6712, stating that you submit on the tentative. Please include the hearing date, the case name and case number on your telefax. Do not call in lieu of sending a telefax, nor should you call to see if your telefax has been received. If you submit on the tentative without appearing and the opposing party appears, you run the inherent risk of the hearing being conducted in your absence and the final ruling differing from the tentative.
The court's tentative ruling is to:
Continue Plaintiff's motion for a court order for deposition of incarcerated defendant Christopher Lee Zink for proper notice to be given.
Discussion
The Motion was mail served on 8/6/15. CCP §1005(b) requires a motion be served at least 16 court days prior to the hearing. If a motion is served by mail, an additional 5 calendars must be added. To have this matter heard on